Talk:Threaded rod

Engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Metalworking Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Thread cutting or rolling

the section about type is incorrect in its implication that "full bodied" studs have cut threads and not rolled threads. The threads may be formed by either technique. 15:46, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

No, it's correct. Rolling threads increases the overall diameter (as the volume and usually the length both stay constant). The uncut diameter thus ends up smaller than the thread's diameter, so can't be "full-bodied". Andy Dingley (talk) 21:58, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strength

I edited the "Strength" section. Both equations have exactly the same dimensional analysis, so I didn't understand the statement that you shouldn't use the second one. Also, Pascal is a Newton per square meter, not per square centimeter.Tejanojim (talk) 19:38, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]