Jump to content

Talk:Thomas Winning

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Page Move

[edit]

Before moving the article again, please read Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Western clergy). Thanks. Gentgeen 22:09, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Before moving this article again please read the top of the official policy on WP:NAME. Generally, article naming should give priority to what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature. Another way to summarize the overall principle of Wikipedia's naming conventions: Names of Wikipedia articles should be optimized for readers over editors; and for a general audience over specialists.
See, here's the thing. No-one outside specialists ever referred to Tom Winning as 'Thomas Cardinal Winning'. He is invariable known as Tom Winning, Cardinal Winning, or Thomas Winning
  • Google "Thomas Cardinal Winning" = 48 hits (NOT impressive) [1]
  • Google "'Thomas Winning' and Cardinal" = 9,450 [2]
  • Google "Cardinal Winning" = 17,200 [3]
  • BBC obituary 'Cardinal Thomas Winning' [4]
  • His own Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Glasgow 'Thomas Joseph Winning' or 'Cardinal Winning' [5]
I'd say that's pretty conclusive. Your western clergy guideline is obviously not in conformity with policy - perhaps you should update it?. --Doc 23:09, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Do we need to put the title "His Eminence" before every bishop's name on Wikipedia? Catholics may choose to do so, but this doesn't sound very secular/encyclopedic to me. Allowing this practice seems a bit like allowing Muslims to put the phrase "Peace be upon him" after every mention of a prophet. -- Big Brother 1984 18:21, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

'Eminence' is a title for cardinals only. Ulysses54 13:34, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Winning was a Cardinal! 79.73.26.171 (talk) 01:39, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed it is unneccessary.--Docg 13:42, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Thomas Winning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Thomas Winning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:20, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]