Talk:Thomas Fuller (architect)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Canada: Toronto Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Factual accuracy

Gothic revival architecture seems to have been applied by default to Fuller's buildings, but in building after building, one can see from main articles or WP:RS that that is not always or even usually the case. I've made one correction. There is more work to do this regard, though, so I think it should be tagged as such until the problem is corrected -- so readers are not misled. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:22, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed the Library bulding to Victorian High Gothic style. Are there others you feel should be changed or can we remove the banner?— Rod ^talk 12:45, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Boy, this is a fluke. I stopped watching this page and came here as a result of work I'm now doing on Wikidata. Anyway, Rod, imo, no, the tag should remain. I don't have time to go through all the suspect links but one of the 1st ones I've checked, the Almonte post office, was wrong: the historic sites designation makes it clear it's Romanesque revival. Until someone can vet all of User:Victoriaedwards' edits here, the tag should remain, imo. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:09, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, I checked two more, going to the historic places pages, and they're both wrong. sorry I cannot help more. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:24, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Today, I corrected more buildings wrongly labeled per their architectural styles. I think they're all correct, save for the Royal Military College. Of course, the mess also affects the RMC main article, which I've raised at Talk:Royal Military College of Canada#Accuracy. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:52, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on improving the accuracy. You suggest all are now correct except the RMC. I have looked at the Heritage Character Statement for this and am still unsure what to change it to in this article for the three RMC buildings - what would you suggest?— Rod ^talk 10:13, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any suggestions, sorry. Please do as you think best -- leave the tag on the page or remove it. thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:39, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment all three lines in the table for the RMC say "Neo-Gothic" - never having seen them it is difficult to try to put better labels. The riding establishment heritage character statement you linked to doesn't give a particular architectural style. I've also looked at the Historic Register details for Royal Military College of Canada Building 2, Building 3, Building 6 etc and they seem to be quite eclectic styles rather than all following a particular scheme, so I'm at a bit of a loss as to how to describe them. How about replacing "neo-gothic" with a "?" for those three entries?— Rod ^talk 20:55, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. No, we don't do placeholders in article texts, here. Just remove the text from those fields, leave them blank, with an edit summary that explains why, is my suggestion. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:09, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks. I've done as you suggested. If anyone objects they will hopefully come here to discuss.— Rod ^talk 07:54, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Thomas Fuller (architect). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:29, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:06, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]