Talk:Thomas Chatterton

Poetry Mid‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Bristol High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bristol, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bristol-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BristolWikipedia:WikiProject BristolTemplate:WikiProject BristolBristol articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	At least one photograph is included in this article
	This article does not require a map
	This article has an infobox

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on November 20, 2021 and November 20, 2022.

Chatterton Statue

Is there any truth to the rumour that there is to be a Thomas Chatterton statue placed nearby his London flat? If so, please advise, I'd like to do further research. thankyou JerricaB (talk) 10:19, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chatterton manuscripts

Article says:

The Chatterton manuscripts, originally in the possession of William Barrett of Bristol, were left by his heir to the British Museum in 1800. Others are preserved in the Bristol library.

Given the first sentence, I wonder what the 'others' could be. Perhaps the comma parenthesis in the first sentence is incorrect. William Avery 09:35, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, obviously an error (which I have just corrected), though probably beyond the grammatical experience of most Wikipedia 'editors' to discern. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.130.102.217 (talk) 04:58, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure where the revisions should begin as this article seems to have been copied largely from the Encyclopedia Brittanica. Maxdwolf (talk) 21:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is hard to believe that the author of this article has actually looked at any of Chatterton's poems. The fraudulent medievalism worked because, as the author notes too briefly, 18th-century readers had no knowledge of much before Shakespeare. But simply as poems, they are often awkward, prosy and dull. Josephlestrange (talk) 14:24, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

serge

Do we need the enigmatic lines of M. Gainsbourg to help us to an understanding of this brilliant wayward talent ? In my opinion: no, we don't (Pamour (talk) 23:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

Neutrality banner

In November User:Bellerophon5685 added a banner saying the neutrality of this article is disputed. Can we discuss the problem and identify what can be done to resolve it?— Rod ^talk 10:35, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To me the article seemed like it was written, in the parlance of our times, by a fanboy. It seems a little too liberal in its praise of Chattertons genius. Or at least it did when I added the banner.--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 20:15, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, how do I link to the wikionary entry for "abstimeous"--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 21:02, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You probably want something like abstemious. Help is at H:IW. William Avery (talk) 21:16, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding neutrality, I think there are still some oddly plummy phrases from 1911 Britanicca or the like. William Avery (talk) 21:35, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For instance, we still have "the love of mystery which exercised such an influence on the development of his genius." The word "genius" might have been neutral once, I wonder if "poetry", (or "poetics", "oeuvre", maybe even "poesy") could be substituted. William Avery (talk) 23:35, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Thomas Chatterton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111214003022/http://www.guide2bromley.com/news/232/Chatterton-Village-Bromley-Common to http://www.guide2bromley.com/news/232/Chatterton-Village-Bromley-Common

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:00, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]