Talk:Thingiverse

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Thingiverse article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Websites: Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Open (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen articles

notability

Thingiverse is a technological community that represents creators from around the world. The shared focus of Thingiverse is to spread user-created design files that can be reproduced with physical CNC tools. It is not currently oriented towards financial gain, only to providing an outlet for open-source licensed design files that users may freely access and iterate. Thingiverse is in use by many professional and amateur designers and many technical interest groups are represented. It is a significant and growing resource to the public, and is a central hub for the world of 3D Printing and Lasercutting.

Hello UncleIze, and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. For a website to have an article on Wikipedia, it must meet certain conditions of Wikipedia:Notability_(web). In short, a page must be "the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself. This criterion includes reliable published works in all forms, such as newspaper and magazine articles, books, television documentaries, websites, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations[4] except for the following. This website does not appear to meet that criteria. Sheeana ^Talk 06:39, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would disagree. Thingiverse has been in existence for a while and the subject of numerous verifiable articles and websites. ( http://www.google.com/search?q=thingiverse&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#sc lient=psy&hl=en&safe=active&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aofficial&q=thingiverse+-thingiverse.com&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&pbx=1&fp=3abe5adf4192a0aa ) Thingiverse has been the subject of numerous print magazines as well, including, most notably, Wired. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MakerBot#cite_note-wired-3 ) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.85.243.100 (talk) 06:49, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Pax: I have added two citations to articles relating to Thingiverse. Thingiverse is a significant part of the maker community represented in publications like Make Magazine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.52.254.158 (talk) 12:52, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone who is exposed to digital fabrication in the world of do-it-yourself (DIY) cultures knows about thingiverse. It is the most well-known repository of digital open source hardware. However, this culture, though significant in both its scale and influence, is its own world. Only occasionally does it get attention from major media outlets. For one, if fab labs and hackerspaces and the "maker movement" in general are significant enough to have their articles, then thingiverse should, because it is the most central repository for makerbot designs. I see that Ponoko does not have its own article yet either, though it made a considerable splash in the mainstream media. I am starting that article now :)

With what I know, here are some good resources to begin:

An introductory video by the Wall Street Journal: [1]
And this front-cover article in Inc Magazine about Ponoko (which is basically the same thing as thingiverse, not open-source) [2]

NittyG (talk) 16:53, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Open vs Close source / legal ownership controversy?

Shouldn't there be some note here of the current issues with who owns the files / things published on the site? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.176.56.189 (talk) 19:00, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]