Talk:Theodore and Franklin D. Roosevelt Prize in Naval History

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Military history: Historiography / Maritime

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military historiography task force
	Maritime warfare task force

Pritzker Military Library Low‑importance

	This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Copyright Issue

The original contributor has reworded the article, but it still tracks the language of the source. Also, the list may have copyright protection. I'm not sure, so I replaced the deletion tag, added a hangon and am leaving it for assessment by others. --Butseriouslyfolks 04:01, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To my knowledge there is no copyright on the list. They are just book titles and authors' names that are sent out for publication anyway. The second paragraph is entirely new and different, while the first is altered, but gets across the same sense withou t being identical. I would not think that there is a problem here. Both the organization and the authors are glad to get the information out (Jamestown 16:45, 16 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]