Talk:Theodor Wilhelm Engelmann

Physiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the field of physiology.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about a botanist or someone who contributed to the field of botany.

Untitled

Merged Theodor Wilhelm Englemann into this article. No problems. Only question - what was he really noted for? The more detailed article seemed to imply that it was for his research into physiology, while the shorter one mentioned photosynthesis, which I think is the fact more generally taught in schools, for instance. Perhaps the physiology bit should be added to the lead paragraph? --Leviel 11:38, 30 August 2007 (UTC) Hi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.173.162.235 (talk) 00:44, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey it looks like someone may have gotten the type of algae wrong. If you don't believe me check the original source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.88.9.138 (talk) 15:15, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]