Talk:Theme (computing)

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computer graphics Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

I made the picture smaller. Anyone wants to see the gigantic picture, they can click the thumbnail. I'm on 1024 x 768 which isn't that small, and the picture screws up Wikipedia's format. 71.126.151.104 14:54, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Skin (computing) and Theme (computing) articles?

Pages not merged. After being open for over 10 years, the only !votes have been weak opposes. Safe to say there has been no proper consensus found here. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:52, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Theme (computing) and Skin (computing), merging ? 16@r 23:11, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As mentioned in the article, a skin is typically for an individual application or portion of the user experience, while a theme combines many skins for different areas. Some may confuse the terms, but they are not regularly used to mean the same thing in the skinning community. The picture could do with improvement, as it does not really demonstrate that there is a wide variety of applications that may be included in a single theme. GreenReaper 23:37, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose Hi. Theme and skin have an overlapping area but are not the same things. Skin is only a subset of theme that focuses on changing the user interface elements. Theme, however, applies to documents (e.g. Word 2007 themes) and workspace (e.g. Windows 98 or Notepad++ themes). So, yes, a theme may contain skins too.

Example: Windows 7's skin is called Aero Glass, but it should not be mistaken with its built-in themes called Architecture, Characters, Landscapes, Nature and Scenes. Also Word 2013 has three skins (White, Light Gray and Dark Gray) but a lot of themes like Facet, Ion, Integral, Banded, Basis, Berlin, etc. (Of course, in Office 2013, both of these are called "Office Themes"!) Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 17:30, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

weak oppose Yes, they're overlapping but different. Skins are applied "outside" an application and "wrap" that application in an appearance that affects most or all of it. Themes are more like toolboxes of gadgets - they affect the internal components (such as icon or button sets) and they usally spread across a whole desktop, not just one application.

This is a subtle distinction and it will need sources to support any definition given, but I think there's enough distance between them to support separate articles. Viam Ferream (talk) 10:43, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Revisit the merge

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To merge Skin into Theme, given overlap. Klbrain (talk) 09:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think, years later, it's worth revisiting this. Neither article does a decent job (or any job) clarifying what the distinction between the two is supposed to be, and indeed in looking for sources it seems like themes/skins are used interchangeably (hell, both articles are using the exact same image as the lead.) The only specific places where it seems like there's a distinction are in certain specific applications, which aren't really covered by these articles anyhow. A single article covering the vernacular, while disambiguating the certain situations where themes and skins refer to different things, seems like a better option with reduced redundancy. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 15:01, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@David Fuchs, I wonder if we should just merge whatever is relevant in the Skin article into the Theme article, and then rewrite Skin to just be about video game cosmetics? There are a lot of sources about them and now that we're a few years from the original merge discussion, any reliable sources talking about "skins" in a computing sense are likely talking about video games. Agree that other than that particular use, I don't think the articles stand up well on their own. Alyo (chat·edits) 19:47, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It certainly seems like these days "skins" are much more about game cosmetics. But at that point I think it would make sense to just point the skin to skin gambling, since it doesn't seem like there would be a lot of content that can or should exist apart from the legal issues, which seem to generate the sourcing. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 20:26, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge as originally proposed, of merging Theme (computing) and Skin (computing), perhaps to Theme (computing) as the broader concept. Video gaming use can be covered in another section (as it already is at Skin (computing)#Video gaming, and that can certainly link to skin gambling. The primary reason for the merge would be overlap. Klbrain (talk) 13:45, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Merge per reasons above Quinnerwinner12 (talk) 09:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Theme pack and Theme (computing) merging?

I don't know. --Patrick Maitland 18:47, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"MapleStory" theme?

The article has a picture entitled "MapleStory Theme".

...looks to me like a Windows Server 2003 installation with the Watercolor visual-style (created by Microsoft in late 2000 for beta Windows XP, it was never officially released) and a MapleStory wallpaper. The icons are all stock.

I vouch replacing it with a screenshot from a "real" themed desktop, not just a changed wallpaper and first-party skin. Who remembers those cool "Desktop Themes" that came with Windows 98/Plus 98? I liked the space ones :)

W3bbo 23:13, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I always liked the 16-bit chess image they had in Windows 3.0 . . . GreenReaper 23:45, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes yes yes yes yes. It seems to me that's a really lame excuse for a "theme". It make way more sense to eliminate those images, and have a photo gallery at the bottom of the page showing various themes. Themes from Windows, Linux, Mac (do they have themes?), whatever else. If no one else says no, I'll go ahead and make some changes. There's a lot of themes out there. --Tech Nerd 04:22, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Vista6000-notify.png

Image:Vista6000-notify.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:03, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]