Talk:The Zygon Inversion

Doctor Who Mid‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jemma Redgrave's possible appearance

On the Radio Time's cast list for the Zygon Invasion, Jemma Redgrave is stated to be appearing, but for the Zygon Inversion, the is no mention of her on the cast list. However there is a source from Doctor Who TV (reference 1 on the main article), stating her involvement in the double episode. The editors are having a dispute over if she appears in this episode, so I'm trying to sort it out here.Theoosmond (talk) 23:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, reverting and then posting a discussion - poor editing. Just saying. And RadioTimes episode article often begin with a small list of cast, before extending it further closer to the episode's release date. We don't have to base the cast/guest list entirely on one source - we are able to use multiple sources, and if another reliable source states that Redgrave will be present in the episode, then she is to be listed. Alex|The|Whovian 02:13, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was just grabbing your attention with a revert. From what I intrepret from the source, stating she appears in the double episode means she will appear in the first, the second or both episodes. As the double episode is The Zygon Invasion and The Zygon Inversion put together, and if an actor were to appear in just one of those episodes, they would be appearing the double episode. I'm not doubting you can use as many sources as needed to get the full cast list, but there is no known source that Jemma Redgrave will appear in this episode. She will appear in The Zygon Invasion, and appearing in just that episode would count as appearing in the double episode. Theoosmond (talk) 09:20, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

She IS in Inversion - See the trailer for Inversion here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3LMOcIDTSU Badgerdog2 (talk) 22:52, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The first names

When the Doctor and Osgood say their first names, they said it too quickly, can somebody please write them down for me?

Person23i (talk) 03:14, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was Basil and Petronella. Ratemonth (talk) 05:15, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Terrorost analogy

Should the extended analogy to Islamic terrorim in Britain be mentioned somewhere or is it too delicate a subject? Or just too obvious?79.94.252.170 (talk) 11:21, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It should be mentioned when reliable sources mention it. DonQuixote (talk) 14:53, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Viewing figures

The viewing figures are said to be 4.22 but two other sources say 4.13: http://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/doctor-who-series-9-2015-uk-ratings-accumulator-76154.htm http://guide.doctorwhonews.net/story.php?story=TheZygonInvasion/2 BlueBlue11 (talk) 12:47, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The plane being shot down

Is it worth adding into 'reception' a bit about the complaints at the plane being shot down - see here 94.4.98.216 (talk) 11:58, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources would be required. Alex|The|Whovian 12:02, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The link is a source surely? 94.4.98.216 (talk) 20:21, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It would fall under a WP:FRINGE view if the only source for it was the BBC complaints department. --MASEM (t) 20:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ofcom have commented on this, basically deciding that it didn't require investigation, and the story was reported in outlets including The Guardian. I recently added mention of it to 2015 in British television so could include a couple of sentences on the topic here as well. This is Paul (talk) 21:10, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]