User talk:Badgerdog2
I've spent about 2 hours trying to find separate news fit the witch's familiar that isn't the magician's apprentice, so I'll probably leave it for a while. Also, when the episode is broadcast, who will be doing the plot and such, or will it be referenced from a review on another site?
Youdidntknowiwashere (talk) 18:35, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Doctor Who Series 9 Episode 8 Writers
[edit]Hi, I saw the recent edits you made to Doctor Who (series 9) but the citation you provided does not seem to back it up. Do you mean it's only in the magazine? If so, use {{cite journal}}, like so:
{{cite journal |last= |first= |date= |title= |journal=[[Doctor Who Magazine]] |publisher=[[Panini UK]] |access-date=19 August 2015 }}
- Fill in 'date' with the publication date on the magazine.
- Fill in 'title' with the title of the article containing your information.
- Fill in 'last' and 'first' with the name of the writer of the article. For a second author use 'last2' and 'first2' as well. If no writers are listed, use
- |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> instead.
If you have any questions, let me know here or on my talk page.
-Alicia Florrick (talk) 17:30, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Just saw your latest edit. Thanks for changing the source. Alicia Florrick (talk) 17:31, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Ah it's fine. Don't worry. Badgerdog2 (talk) 18:25, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
I would like to invite you to contribute to a discussion on whether or not "The Girl Who Died" and "The Woman Who Lived" and "Heaven Sent" and "Hell Bent" are two-parters. Over the course of 3 weeks and 2 discussions, only 3 editors including myself have contributed, so it would be a great help if you could take the time to contribute. Fan4Life (talk) 14:12, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Badgerdog2. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)