Talk:The Wounded Montenegrin

The Wounded Montenegrin has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 19, 2016. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Wounded Montenegrin article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Montenegro Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montenegro, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montenegro on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontenegroWikipedia:WikiProject MontenegroTemplate:WikiProject MontenegroMontenegro articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Serbia Mid‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Wounded Montenegrin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: FunkMonk (talk · contribs) 23:01, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll review this article. FunkMonk (talk) 23:01, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to update the image with a more high res version?
The image page could need a better description template.
" In line with Müller's advice, Jovanović avoids creating a sentimental work" It seems a bit odd that the tense changes to present for much of the rest of the article, after being past tense in the background section.
"are reminiscent of images of the lamentation over the body of Christ." You could link Lamentation of Christ.
Perhaps mention if the artist made similar works later? If so, they could perhaps be shown?
No known preparatory sketches or alternate versions?
Since the article title is English, I'd assume that version should be shown first, with the Serbian title in parenthesis, if that is the common English name.
The intro seems a bit short. A couple more lines could maybe be good to beef it up, perhaps more summarising of background.
Perhaps a photo of the painter under background?
Was the painting influential in any way?

Thanks for taking the time, FunkMonk. Will address your comments tomorrow. 23 editor (talk) 19:56, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You there, 23 editor? FunkMonk (talk) 18:57, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, just busy in real life. I've addressed some of your points and am in the middle of addressing the rest. 23 editor (talk) 01:23, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, just notify me when you're done, 23 editor. I will review your other article when this one is going somewhere. FunkMonk (talk) 14:51, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All done, I think. I haven't been able to find any sketches online or sources suggesting other versions. Was the painting influential? Depends what you mean. It secured the artist a contract with an important art gallery and is considered one of his best orientalist works. I wouldn't say it had a palpable impact on contemporary artists (especially Western ones), nor can I find any sources to that effect. 23 editor (talk) 01:46, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me now, so will pass. Happy you could find a larger version of the image (I couldn't when I looked). FunkMonk (talk) 14:36, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]