Talk:The Woo/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 00:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Basic stuff and comments

• Infobox is in great shape!
• "a number of" → "several" (less wordy)
• "out Roddy Ricch" → "out to Roddy Ricch"
• "Roddy Ricch never was able catch up with Pop Smoke when he was alive. They would say hello sometimes while passing each other" does not sound Wikipedia-ish.

Removed

• Add references at the end of each sentence containing a quote per WP:QUOTE.
• Remove the comma after "from Pop Smoke".
• "commented the" → "commented that the"
• Add a serial comma after "Pop Smoke, 50 Cent".
• "labelled" → "labeled" (American English)
• "inspiration creating" → "inspiration for creating"
• "also features" → "also feature" (American English)
• Archive sources (either manually or with this tool).
• The reference after "abilities" is missing a "|last5=" parameter.
• Mark references from Los Angeles Times with "|url-access=limited".
• Mark references from Rolling Stone with "|url-access=limited".
• Mark references from Vulture with "|url-access=limited".

Some Dude From North Carolina thanks so much for the review. I have addressed all of your concerns. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 08:38, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

@The Ultimate Boss: A recite is needed after "global superstardom" and there are Rolling Stone and Vulture references that need "|url-access=limited". After addressing these issues, ping me, and I'll pass the article. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:25, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Some Dude From North Carolina Done. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 06:19, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·