Talk:The Woo

The Woo has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 5, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Hip hop Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Woo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 00:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basic stuff and comments

Infobox is in great shape!
"a number of" → "several" (less wordy)
"out Roddy Ricch" → "out to Roddy Ricch"
"Roddy Ricch never was able catch up with Pop Smoke when he was alive. They would say hello sometimes while passing each other" does not sound Wikipedia-ish.

Removed

Add references at the end of each sentence containing a quote per WP:QUOTE.
Remove the comma after "from Pop Smoke".
"commented the" → "commented that the"
Add a serial comma after "Pop Smoke, 50 Cent".
"labelled" → "labeled" (American English)
"inspiration creating" → "inspiration for creating"
"also features" → "also feature" (American English)
Archive sources (either manually or with this tool).
The reference after "abilities" is missing a "|last5=" parameter.
Mark references from Los Angeles Times with "|url-access=limited".
Mark references from Rolling Stone with "|url-access=limited".
Mark references from Vulture with "|url-access=limited".

Some Dude From North Carolina thanks so much for the review. I have addressed all of your concerns. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 08:38, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The Ultimate Boss: A recite is needed after "global superstardom" and there are Rolling Stone and Vulture references that need "|url-access=limited". After addressing these issues, ping me, and I'll pass the article. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:25, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some Dude From North Carolina Done. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 06:19, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·