Jump to content

Talk:The Wide, Wide World

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

I am reinstating all deleted material as what was listed as "copyright infringement" from bleckblog.org/wide was in fact written by myself. I have left a note on bleckglog.org/wide to verify this.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Tao of tyler (talk • contribs)

Please note that the original text was not even attributed, while the site has a copyright notice, so how should one know? Moreover, reducing the text and removing at least avoided a speedy deletion with the content remining in the edit histry, so I wouldn't call it improper.--Tikiwont 09:13, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I understand, simple mistake to make. Is the stamp I left on bleckblog.org/lit enough to verify that this was our content enough to verify? If it isnt, Id be willing to delete the content on bleckblog.org/lit first. Also inform me if the sources have not been done properly. I had a tricky time getting the notes to work, and any help is appreciated.--Tao of tyler 09:31, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I saw you cleaned up the notes, thanks for your help. Again, if theres anything additional I need to do to verify, please inform me. I dont want to have to go through and put that all up again. --Tao of tyler 09:33, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, actually sorry if I've bitten you. I now found a less intimidating message for such a case (Template:Nothanks) and a better variant for your site might be: "We, (name), are the authors of this article, (article name), and we release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." As this is now also documented here on the talk page, it should be fine, and there is no reason to delete content from the blog. --Tikiwont 09:50, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, you were just doing your job. Thanks for your help on everything. The message has been added to bleckblog.org/lit/wide permitting use. --Tao of tyler 19:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

I've removed the book itself, since it is not a reference and created one web citaion. You can then sue this template template:web cite other ones, nut I have doubst about the e-notes ref. --Tikiwont 10:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on The Wide, Wide World. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:32, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Wide,_Wide_World&oldid=1209893882"