User talk:Tao of tyler
Rules
[edit]1. No uncivil comments will be tolerated. If you're going to try and communicate with me here about an issue, please maintain some degree of civility for the sake of reasonable discussion. I will be fairly lenient for one-time offenders who will receive warning. Continued abuse will be reported immediately.
2. I delete/reorder the content of this talk page for cosmetic purposes regularly. If a comment of yours is deleted, do not take it personally and definitely do not revert the edit.
3. Violating the previous rules will result in your comment being ignored and promptly deleted.
4. Please sign your comments.
5. Editing these rules will be regarded as vandalism and will be reported immediately. In addition, any editing/vandalism of my comments or the comments of others will be reported immediately.
Re: July 2007
[edit]Hi, thanks for expressing your concerns. If you actually took the time to look at each participant contributions before templating me (which I won't consider rude, only funny since I'm a member of WP:UW), You would have seen that I tried to communicate with the IP removing large portions of text in this article without any form of comment. I crossed this article during vandal fighting and have no opinion about the article in question. Have a nice day. -- lucasbfr talk 10:43, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Ha! How embarrassing. I figured I'd slip up on something like that one of these days. Sorry about that.--Tao of tyler 10:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thank you for the revert on my user page :-) Myanw 12:02, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
- No problem --Tao of tyler 15:14, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
About a fortnight ago, you posted a request for editor assistance on the Man vs. Wild article. Sorry for the delay, but I finally was able to provide some constructive feedback on the subject. When you receive this message, could you please provide an update on the situation? Also, let me know if the feedback was of any help to you. Cheers, --Aarktica 13:25, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for warning off the vandal(s)
[edit]Don't know what I did to annoy them. --Orange Mike 03:14, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. Shows that you've been doing a good enough job editing to make one of them have a vendetta against you.--Tao of tyler 12:42, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- Or they may just not like Orangemen. (Ironic, since I'm a 32-county man myself.) --Orange Mike 23:15, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)