Talk:The Valley Library/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: RHM22 (talk) 16:07, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No DAB links, external links look fine.

GA review (see here for criteria)

I would like to review your article. I learned quite a bit from reading it.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
The article is short, but it seems to cover the topic thoroughly.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
The facts seem to check out.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
The article seems thorough to me.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
No bias.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Article is stable
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
The images all seem to be tagged correctly.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Nice work!-RHM22 (talk) 16:15, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.