Talk:The Valley Library

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Valley Library article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The Valley Library has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 14, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 1, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Oregon State University's first standalone library (current library pictured) was not opened until 1918 even though the school was established in 1868?

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Expansion

Can easily be expanded with some history, such as was previously the Kerr Library (anyone with old pics with the ugly metal screens), and expanded to the current size from 1995ish-1998ish, plus obviuosly the original construction time/costs etc. Aboutmovies 20:29, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Valley Library/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: RHM22 (talk) 16:07, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No DAB links, external links look fine.

GA review (see here for criteria)

I would like to review your article. I learned quite a bit from reading it.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
The article is short, but it seems to cover the topic thoroughly.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
The facts seem to check out.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
The article seems thorough to me.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
No bias.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Article is stable
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
The images all seem to be tagged correctly.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Nice work!-RHM22 (talk) 16:15, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Special Collections and Archives

These two have merged. They will both have the same service point by Fall 2012, so sometime after then, the article should list them together as the same entity. Might need some reworking of sources to make it flow well though.ibleedorange14 22:36, 3 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibleedorange14 (talk • contribs)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on The Valley Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:32, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]