Talk:The Tempestry Project/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: I'll take this one. Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 20:01, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]- This is an elegant and well-cited article and I don't expect I'll have many comments to make on it.
"Data art" should be linked in the lead. So maybe should things like "Trump administration" and "climatologist".
I've put Mathematics and art in the See also list, but it may be that the section on "mathekniticians" deserves a mention directly here also. You could, for instance, use this to lead into the article, or into the 'Similar artworks' section, i.e. maths/art ... data art ... Tempestries (getting more and more specialised).
I wonder, too, if a more general mention of Science in art wouldn't be helpful. You might use sources such as "11 Fascinating Artists Inspired by Science". Now there's an interesting redlink ...
"will sometimes vary slightly" - should be "will inevitably vary" or near offer.
Suggest that the image in 'Display' should be a deal wider (set parameter "|upright=1.7", say) as its display area is much smaller than the other images.
The 'Similar artworks' section should maybe be divided into sections on works influenced by Tempestries, and data art more generally.
Overall, there's really nothing much wrong with this article, and I expect to see it at GA shortly. Nice work. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:14, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for starting the review, and for the kind words! I'll get to work on these things! --valereee (talk) 10:16, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- Well I think that's all done really. Certainly there is scope for other articles on science and art, and eventually a navbar template too perhaps on the lines of Template:Mathematics and art. There is much interest in photography of science, too, surely an article in that. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:41, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- Chiswick Chap, I actually just created Climate change art from the info in this article, thinking it's a pretty fair stub at this point. I had literally been thinking that I was finding enough articles about Climate change art that it could be an article when you mentioned a redlink! Thanks again for the exceptionally constructive review! --valereee (talk) 17:45, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- That's great to hear, thank you. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:51, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- Chiswick Chap, I actually just created Climate change art from the info in this article, thinking it's a pretty fair stub at this point. I had literally been thinking that I was finding enough articles about Climate change art that it could be an article when you mentioned a redlink! Thanks again for the exceptionally constructive review! --valereee (talk) 17:45, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- Well I think that's all done really. Certainly there is scope for other articles on science and art, and eventually a navbar template too perhaps on the lines of Template:Mathematics and art. There is much interest in photography of science, too, surely an article in that. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:41, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for starting the review, and for the kind words! I'll get to work on these things! --valereee (talk) 10:16, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.