This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article states that this film is the third completed live-action film produced by Disney, it also being the third "British" film. But, wasn't "Song Of The South" Disney's first live-action film? If that is true, wouldn't that make this one the fourth live-action film, instead of the third? Just trying to get the facts straight. Kenny HaarFager (talk) 20:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Although "Song of the South" is mostly live-action, it does include animated elements similar to "Mary Poppins". "Treasure Island" and the other three parts of the "British series" (Robin Hood, The Sword and the Rose, and Rob Roy) were the first films produced by Walt Disney Studios which can be seen as entirely live-action.Richardtoddfan (talk) 01:53, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]