Talk:The Sign of Three

Media franchises: Sherlock Holmes Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media franchises, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to media franchises on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Media franchisesWikipedia:WikiProject Media franchisesTemplate:WikiProject Media franchisesmedia franchise articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sherlock Holmes.

Television: British / Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Grenadier Guard

A editor keeps re-adding the claim [1] that the stabbed guardsman is a Grenadier Guard. This is unsourced, and also inaccurate. As per the footnote (which they keep deleting), they're not Grenadier Guards, but Welsh Guards. This is very obvious from the uniforms worn throughout the episode.

As to claims of it being unsourced and primary in nature, the whole article is based on a primary source to a fictional TV series! Andy Dingley (talk) 16:58, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The footnote that you want is your personal observation and thus original research. Please provide a secondary reliable source for verification. DonQuixote (talk) 17:14, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep adding a link to Grenadier Guardsman when that is both unsourced and also demonstrably inaccurate? Andy Dingley (talk) 17:25, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've been reverting your original research. Change it to the generic guardsman if you want. DonQuixote (talk) 17:28, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's hardly a good link either, Foot Guards#British Army is better. I'd added it as such, but you reverted that too. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:44, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Look, the point is, please don't add anything that involves any sort of personal analysis because that's original research. Other than that, go right ahead change it to that link. DonQuixote (talk) 17:49, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Does it really matter? It's an extremely minor point in the episode. This likely falls under the category of bloopers, and bloopers are rarely included in good episode articles. Only if the blooper is really major or controversial, and so far this one is a negatory on both counts. Leave it as guard and stay out of unneeded specifics. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 22:00, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tight belt will cause one unable to even feel the stabbing?

Both Guardsman named Bainbridge and Major James Sholto were "stabbed with a stiletto-type blade beforehand, but with the military waist belt firmly holding the flesh together, the damage would not take effect until the belt loosened".

The show further explains, "Tight belt, worn high on the waist. Very easy to push a small blade through the fabric and you wouldn't even feel it."

Really? A tight belt and you will not even feel the stabbing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Athos.jingle (talk • contribs) 02:56, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's a tv show and what can or can't happen in the real world is largely irrelevant. What does happen or is said on the show is what we need to place within the plot section. However they will have technical advisors who will tell them what can & can't be done, although whether they take that advice is up to the show which is fictional. Blethering Scot 09:35, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Sign of Three. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140718204656/http://www.barb.co.uk/whats-new/weekly-top-10 to http://www.barb.co.uk/whats-new/weekly-top-10

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:22, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Audience viewing figures

The figures quoted in the opening and later sections are contradictory (also not fitting with indications in His Last Vow) and the link from the opening section is incorrect. Can anyone clarify this? Hyperman 42 (talk) 17:25, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]