Talk:The Shadow of the Past
Appearance
The Shadow of the Past has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 25, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Shadow of the Past/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 05:04, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Many thanks for taking this on. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:24, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Lead
[edit]- "in 1954–55" → "from 1954–55"?
- No, in that pair of years.
- Mention Frodo's last name.
- Done.
History
[edit]- Link philologist.
- Linked.
- "in 1954–55" → "from 1954–55"
- As above.
- "young cousin Bingo" Bingo? This needs a in square brackets explanation.
- Glossed.
- In "The crucial chapter", capitalize the races (hobbits, elfs), unless it was done intentionally?
- Hey, did you miss this? Everything else is done, so as soon as this is addressed the article can be passed. AryKun (talk) 09:08, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ah yes, done.
- Hey, did you miss this? Everything else is done, so as soon as this is addressed the article can be passed. AryKun (talk) 09:08, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- "protagonist, Frodo" → Add last name.
- Done.
Plot
[edit]- "The wizard Gandalf" → In other articles, I've seen you capitalize Wizard as well.
- Done.
- Link Isildur.
- Moved link to first mention.
- "a hobbit" → Capitalize.
- Done.
Structure
[edit]- I don't see "there and back again" in the Tor.com review?
- Ah yes, it's in the alternative version, the same thoughts presented in a table, which I've added to the citation.
Misc
[edit]- All the refs are reliable and spot-checks on the ones I could access found that they supported what they were used to cite.
- Noted.
- I would suggest adding alt text to the images, although it isn't required for GA. AryKun (talk) 05:04, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- All right, added.
I think that's all done to date. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:24, 25 January 2022 (UTC)