Talk:The Scout Association
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Scout Association article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
The Scout Association was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
GA Reassessment
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: Large-scale WP:RECENTISM issues, along with violations of GA criterion 2. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:55, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
The article hasn't been maintained to GA standards and requires a bit of work to get back:
- There are 8 cn tags
- The history is slanted towards recent events (summary style)
- Some WP:overcitation
- Neutrality concerns in recent history
- Unclear sentences (clarification needed). Femke (alt) (talk) 09:38, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.