Talk:The Saturdays discography

The Saturdays discography received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Christmas Wrapping#Other versions|Christmas Wrapping]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Scottish singles chart

I've temporarily removed these columns until a proper, reliable, permanent source is cited. Right now, we have a source for one album's chart position, which cannot be used for everything else also. Once a good source is found, please feel free to re-add the info. - eo (talk) 15:47, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On the topic of Scottish Singles Chart, it is now a recognised official chart on the Official Charts Company website. I will updated it into the discography and REPLACE European singles chart which are no longer produced by a reliable source, only by independant companies. As other artist discographies have done, it should have removed off the main page but kept on individual song pages. - Bbbnbbb (talk) 18:43, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Headlines!

Headlines has been confirmed as a mini studio album, so it should go down as studio albums, like it has on the actual page... --86.131.206.158 (talk) 14:44, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Missing You, Single has sold Silver in the Uk

--Mathiassandell (talk) 16:20, 11 December 2010 (UTC) Missing You, Single has sold Silver in the Uk, according to wikipedia itself, they said that Missing You has sold over 200,000 copies in the Uk, so can somebody wright down in the single sexion of Missing You, UK: Silver[reply]

another wiki article is not a source for certifications. it is not certified according to the bpi. Mister sparky (talk) 20:09, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Headlines/Bulgaria Peak Positions

Bbbnbbb (talk), Headlines should be under studio albums as the expanded version is long enough to be classed as an album. It is also regularly referred to as an album.

Bulgaria chart positions should be left in as they are real and come off the chart archive for the Bulgaria singles chart provided in the reference of the chart. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbbnbbb (talk • contribs) 11:17, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Certifcations

I don't know whether it is an error on BPIs behalf, but The Saturdays recieved their gold award for Headlines! but maybe due to the fact it is a mini LP and not a normal LP, it hasn't been recorded on the website, also both Missing You and Higher should also be down as silver, because multiple sources have said that they have sold over 200,000 and reliable ones at that, especially Higher, some sources are saying Missing You is just under 200,000, but I'm sure it's over by now, perhaps we'll have to wait till the next album and see if they update anything.Jewls1993 (talk) 17:05, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BPI certifications are for shipments to retailers, not sales to the public. an album or song certification has to be applied for and then paid for by the record company. they are not automatic. so it is irrelevant how much a song or album has apparently sold. Mister sparky (talk) 00:16, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that was the old method, because now singles can get certified with only downloads right, for example didn't S&M by Rihanna reach Silver before it's physical release? But still there is a picture somewhere that was posted on Twitter that Rochelle took that showed the Gold disc for Headlines, I'll go find it then post the link here86.140.34.207 (talk) 18:27, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here it is: http://twitpic.com/3gel1r 86.140.34.207 (talk) 18:45, 22 March 2011 (UTC) and yes that is official, Headlines is the one in the middle and is clearly Gold.[reply]

that pic shows 2 million sales for headlines, definitely not from the uk. headlines has not been certified by the bpi. Mister sparky (talk) 22:41, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, the caption is just saying that they have now sold over 2 million records, note how Wordshaker is silver, Chasing Lights is platinum and Headlines in Gold, which is all correct, and let me remind you the UK and Ireland are currently the only countries where you can get physically copies of any of their material.86.140.34.207 (talk) 22:56, 22 March 2011 (UTC) Plus you can quite clearly see a small union flag under the gold headlines disk, confirming it is the UK.[reply]

I agree, it clearly shows that "Chasing lights" has Platinum disc, "Headlines!" has a Gold disc and "Wordshaker" has a Silver disc. those three added up equal 430,000 units and then with six Silver certified singles (1,200,000) added it makes 1,630,000 units and then they probably added sales from uncertified singles and sales over the certification number but lower than a higher certification to make 2,000,000. Pluss I'm sure that for some reason the BPI database sometimes deletes things, there have been a few times i've seen certifications on there and then after a while they dissapear... I think "Headlines!" should have a certification (Gold) added to it since we have photographic evidence. --Duphin (talk) 18:25, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We have a clear consensus that the ONLY reliable and independent source for certificates is the certification provider. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 18:28, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

there doesn't need to be a consensus. it is not certified until the bpi says so. they are the certifiers. it's irrelevant what some random picture says. Mister sparky (talk) 18:38, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah tbh that's true. BPI dishes out the certs, unless they say its certified its not! Record labels have disks like that made all the time to present their artists. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 19:08, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scottish chart positions

I have removed all Scottish Singles and Albums Charts positions before October 2009. The chart archive doesn't support any data before this time. Therefore, we can't verify the positions. If anyone can find a reliable source before this time, they can be added back into the article. Please see WP: CITE and WP: CHARTS. – Underneath-it-All (talk) 19:23, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Saturdays discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150322040621/http://zobbel.de/cluk/CLUK_S.HTM to http://zobbel.de/cluk/CLUK_S.HTM

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:15, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]