Talk:The Santa Clause 3: The Escape Clause/Archive 1

Archive 1

Rename

Rename this Article to The Santa Clause 3: The Escape Clause because it has a subtitle now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.216.74 (talk • contribs) 19:24, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

The Plot!

Where's the story? It should be on this page! The official movie site has more info than us! Das654 04:34, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Probably because not many Wikipedians saw the movie. -24.92.46.16 02:12, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Sequel

There will be a sequel ( The Santa Clause 4 ) ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.48.231.171 (talk) 17:38, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

I hope not!173.58.251.147 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:10, 7 April 2010 (UTC).

Was EM actually pregnant in SC3?

Elizabeth Mitchell gave birth to a son, Christopher Joseph Soldevilla, Jr., on 4 September 2005. Production of The Santa Clause 3 was completed in February 2006. So, was she actually pregnant during the filming of SC3? When exactly were most of the parts where she appears pregnant filmed?-96.237.71.2 (talk) 03:23, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Recent Vandalism

You can thank JonTron for this one. His Christmas special has him vandalizing the wikipedia page. [1]. At least now you know why :) Karunamon ^✉ 16:42, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

I burst out laughing when I saw it; as someone who reverts vandals all the time I did not expect to see that. Jdcomix (talk) 00:34, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Specifically "Tim Allen and Martin Short get some serious $$$$$$$$$$$$ for XMAS." Pingasopera (talk) 14:06, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Copycat vandalism is something that Wikipedia is no stranger to. Classic example: Atlantic Records after the release of the music video for "Weird Al" Yankovic's "White & Nerdy". Blurp92 (talk) 21:02, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Or when Colbert asked his viewers to change the Reality Wikipedia page to only read "Reality has become a commodity." --13.13.16.1 (talk) 17:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Wasn't this originally planned to be a Disney Channel original movie?

A few years ago, I seem to remember this article saying that this movie was originally supposed to be a Disney Channel original movie. Also, the infobox for this article currently says that the budget for this movie was $12 million, which is obviously very low for a movie with as many visual effects as this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrekfan1 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 October 2018

Please change this movie's budget from $12 million to $120 million. $12 million is a very low budget for a movie with as many visual effects as this one. Shrekfan1 (talk) 19:17, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.. I think $12 is correct based on a few Google results. If you can find a reliable source to support your change, please let us know. RudolfRed (talk) 23:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 17 March 2019

tim Allen needed money so he took the role Boyboyman (talk) 07:42, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. NiciVampireHeart 09:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)