Talk:The Rose of Versailles/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Link20XX (talk · contribs) 22:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Morgan695: I have completed my initial review. Just needs a few things before it can be promoted:

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Sourcing:

Comic Natalie is published by Natasha, Inc, so that should be added to those references as the publisher.
- Done.
Link to the article for Anime News Network in the references from them where it is not linked.
- Done.
References 45 and 47 need an author.
- Done.
Reference 59 needs to link to the article on Natalie (website) and needs an access date.
- Done.

Images:

The image of François Augustin Regnier de Jarjayes is tagged with a message stating "You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States."
- That image seemed to be dubiously sourced, so I swapped it for a new one.

Other:

This article lacks even some critical reviews. You should get at least 2 or 3 in Reception.
- Done.

How much of this was translated from French? I'm just curious; this won't effect the GA review and you can completely ignore this if you want.
- Almost entirely. The bulk of the previous article was sourced primarily from fan sites; probably a consequence of the original article being written in the mid-2000s when there were few/no mainstream English-language sources on the series.

Anyway, that is all. Resolve them and I will happily pass the article. Link20XX (talk) 00:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- @Link20XX: Response above. Morgan695 (talk) 18:29, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Morgan695: Alright. Your changes addressed my few concerns so I am closing this review as Pass. Congratulations and thanks for answering my question! Link20XX (talk) 19:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]