Talk:The Power Broker

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state): Long Island

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Long Island, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Urban studies and planning Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Page references

There are evidently a number of different editions this biography with differing page numbers. The NY Times 1981 Moses obituary gives it as 1246 pages. The current Amazon editions list the hardcover at 1336 pages and the paperback at 1344 pages. So for accuracy, comments on page number should list which edition is being used. --Blainster 17:19, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There needs to be citation to the changes in criticism of the book in regards to Moses' power in 1960s. Otherwise it will need to be deleted. Brandonmusic (talk) 03:52, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

50th anniversary

Coming up next year, in 2024 czar 14:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source for New Yorker excerpt of "One Mile" chapter

The article mentions:

"The Power Broker generated substantial public discussion upon publication, especially after the "One Mile" chapter ran as an excerpt in The New Yorker."

I just tried hard finding this excerpt, but the article linked doesn't even mention the word "Tremont" or very much about the content of that chapter at all...

Here is the full series by Caro in the New Yorker at the time:

https://web.archive.org/web/20240903231020/https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1974/07/22/the-power-broker-i-the-best-bill-drafter-in-albany

https://web.archive.org/web/20240901113159/https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1974/07/29/the-power-broker-ii-if-the-end-doesnt-justify-the-means-what-does

https://web.archive.org/web/20240705005708/https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1974/08/12/the-power-broker-iii-how-things-get-done

https://web.archive.org/web/20240705010003/https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1974/08/19/the-power-broker-iv-point-of-no-return

The third one is given as a source, but none of them talk in any depth about the chapter or its contents, from what I can tell.

Does anyone know which article or part is meant here? DaDaDaan (talk) 09:01, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't look like it was ever directly sourced. I'd remove it. Courtesy ping @Daniel Case, in case you recall your source. czar 15:29, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I wrote most of the article at a time when we weren't so strict about sourcing. While I was sure at the time that I'd read that somewhere reliable, I don't remember where and if the New Yorker's own archives don't back this up, there's no reason to keep saying it. Daniel Case (talk) 18:15, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]