Talk:The Peanuts Movie

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Peanuts Movie article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: American / Animated

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Animation: Films / Computer Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

A fact from The Peanuts Movie appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 March 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the scheduled release of the Peanuts movie in 2015 would "commemorate the 65th anniversary of the comic strip and the 50th anniversary of the TV special A Charlie Brown Christmas"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Peanuts Movie.

Wikipedia

Starring parameter in Infobox

Typically, the Starring parameter in Infobox film is only for top-billed actors (or in this case, voice actors), and this one is particularly bloated, listing practically everyone in the film. I haven't actually watched the film yet, so I'm not sure about the billing in the credits, but only the main characters should be listed. Thoughts? Katástasi (κατάσταση) 22:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Generally starring list is those advertised by film marketing as starring. Sometimes this shows up on official posters. Another way is if the film has opening credits some may be listed as starring. If getting the info from the end credits that usually lists everyone. I haven't seen this film so someone needs to check how the actors are credited and prune the list as I agree it is unlikely the current laundry list is accurate. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:27, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Before the film released, the only two there were Charlie Brown's actor and Bill Melendez, which I still feel is a good inclusion for the infobox. As for the film, the on-end credits (ie before the scrolling ones) lists each actor for the characters, which as I recall is not the way it is listed in the cast section. What I do know, is Noah Schnapp was first, and Melendez was last. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Without a better standard to determine the starring cast in order to prune the list it should probably remain reflecting the first time the actors are credited separate from the whole cast. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After seeing the film, the billing in the credits is listed as this: Noah Schnapp, Hadley Belle Miller, Mariel Sheets, Alex Garfin, Francesca Angelucci Capaldi, Troy "Trombone Shorty" Andrews, Kristin Chenoweth, Bill Melendez. Draco9904 (talk) 23:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cast list

The cast list (not the Starring parameter in the Infobox) in this article is all over the place; minor characters are being listed first and everyone is listed in alphabetical order (as far as I know, the cast list shouldn't be in alphabetical order). I tried a couple of times to change it to a more accurate and correct order, even in the order of the Starring parameter, but these changes have been reverted. I don't know why this is and this is bothering me. I haven't seen the film yet so this issue needs to be resolved. Thoughts? -- Draco9904 (talk) 16:33, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What reference did you find to determine the "correct" order. Generally we try to get order from the film credits and how cast is listed there. The cast list generally follows the order of the starring actors listed in the infobox with additional actors added based on end credit order. Listing in order of importance based on editor opinion is original research and is discouraged. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:52, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As a single line per actor list with character names, alphabetical order is reasonable as well. No real reason to change it. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:20, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference for alternative title in lead

An edit here removed the alternative title meaning its inclusion was challenged and indicating that it is contentious. I added it back here with a reference because of that removal. WP:CITELEAD does not prohibit references in the lead section, suggests references for info likely to be challenged, but leaves it up to article editor consensus. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:58, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. I just did a span edit over that, so I only saw your ref addition, not the removal of the title. Ref is fine then, though we can probably use the one of the ones we already have in the article. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:01, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sequel of 'Peanuts'

What happened to the sequel for "The Peanuts Movie" for the next one? What happened to it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tlj1989 (talk • contribs) 03:28, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Animation459 (talk) 11:51, 21 March 2022 (UTC)I'm sure The Peanuts Movie will return to Disney+ in the US on November 4, 2022.[reply]

Weird tone/ overemphasis

Lines like "causing him to be abusively humiliated", "causing... the students to selfishly look down upon him once more", and "thus becoming unpopular again, and, once again, aggressively put down by everyone else", and "thus, finally, making it up to him for their previous actions of selfishness and rude behavior towards him" seem to carry a strange emphatic weight, almost as if added by some kind of masochist or someone who themselves feels hard-done-by in their group of friends. These lines are at the very least rather jarring in the context of the body of the article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.24.234.181 (talk) 00:20, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]