User talk:Draco9904

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Draco9904. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! — Bill william compton^Talk 05:00, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Carrie (2013 film)

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Carrie (2013 film), as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept unsourced material or original research. This includes material lacking cited sources, material obtained through personal knowledge, or which constitutes the an analysis or interpretation by the editor that is not found in cited sources. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 11:47, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to List of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2012 TV series) episodes, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Your edit here broke page formatting, and placed Episode 9 above the rest of the table. The Visual Editor is still buggy, so you're encouraged to double-check your edits via the edit preview option. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:19, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Paranormal Activity: The Marked Ones. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. STATic message me! 04:11, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Carrie (2013 film), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. STATic message me! 08:52, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Flores. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sausage Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Craig Robinson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LEGO The Angry Birds Movie

You did not notice that LEGO The Angry Birds Movie were released on April 4th? CoolDude201672 (talk) 17:51, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Draco9904. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

February 2017

Your addition to Rings (2017 film) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. - Mr X 12:41, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF). About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Draco9904. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

Please do not add your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did in this edit. It doesn't matter whether you believe the film received mixed, mixed-to-positive, or positive reviews. What matters is what Variety says in the source cited. See Talk:Bohemian Rhapsody (film). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:31, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Draco9904. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Draco9904. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cast listing

Please tell me why this edit was an improvement? Debresser (talk) 07:50, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 in film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Lees (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Toy Story 4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emily Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:27, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:45, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on The Grudge (2020 film). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:55, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Draco9904 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not made any accounts aside from "Draco9904". This is the only Wikipedia account I have, and I have not used my account to deceive or manipulate for any purpose. I will fully admit I have made plenty of good faith edits that turned out to be incorrect, unnecessary or unsourced. And for many of those edits, I would have undone the edit myself if it hasn't already been undone by someone else (i live in an Australian time zone). From what I've seen of Pulsifier220's user contributions, he has made edits that I would not have made. For example - on his 20 August 2018 edit on Maleficent: Mistress of Evil, I would not have moved Michelle Pfeiffer down on the "Starring" list. I have kept Pfeiffer in the top 3 spots because of the Filming announcement image that was released at the time (there was no billing or listing order from a Disney press release at the time). Another edit I would not have made was on 6 August 2018 on Us - I would not have replaced Tim Heidecker with Yahya Abdul-Mateen II. Also, I've noticed on one of his edits on Dora and the Lost City of Gold - he brings up his dispute with Rusted AutoParts, as well as used inappropriate language, in the edit summary. This is not something I would have done. I have never been involved in any disputes or edit wars with any other users, and I have never used inappropriate language in edit summaries or talk pages, in my history of using this account. I would prefer to be unblocked sooner than later, but I will gladly accept my indefinite block for the time being if it revolves around my recent good faith but unsourced edit on The Grudge. I promise to make greater efforts to source any edits that require verification by other users. But I have not used this account as a sockpuppet. This is my account. No one else's.

Accept reason:

The unblock request has convinced that I was wrong. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:53, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I had enough evidence to make this an obvious block, but the points you raised have convinced me that I was wrong. I'm sorry about the incorrect block. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:06, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Use of minor edits

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Knives Out (film), as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. – Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 16:18, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Tenet (film). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cognissonance (talk) 06:23, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of American films of 2021, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yola.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hello, I'm Call me when you get the chance. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of films impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Call me when you get the chance 05:25, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Woman in the Window (upcoming film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 01:19, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a movie listing page for 2020 that would include the movies "The Father" and "Wolfwalkers"?

I see the List_of_American_films_of_2020 page shouldn't include those films, but there are some fairly big films, that were nominated for Oscars, that don't appear in any of the lists that already exist for films in 2020, is there a better place to hold them? Okayjg (talk) 20:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is the List of British films of 2020, so they should be included there. I believe "The Father" is already included there (it's under the festival release date at Sundance, but a lot of other films were listed with their festival release dates), so "Wolfwalkers" can be added there. Hope that explains it. -- Draco9904. 6:27, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Crystal ball concerns

Hi! Please avoid using phrases like "The film will be released..." like you did here. Stating that something is going to happen in the future goes against WP:CRYSTAL. Instead, consider using phrasing like "The film is scheduled to be released..." as this states that the film has been given a release date in the present, but does not assume that it will be released on the date. Also, please avoid marking edits at minor when you are adding or significantly modifying content, per WP:ME. BOVINEBOY2008 23:54, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

What was the reason for your edit here? were you trying to censor the article? Dollyplay (talk) 11:22, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was concerned about spoilers for the US audience. It has since been reverted. --Draco9904 (talk) 01:28, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to List of American films of 2021. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eternals

All Disney MCU movies are in 3D and 4D screenings.

Can you edit Eternals page for releasing in RealD 3D and 4DX StarHakimi (talk) 00:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to House of Gucci, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 06:43, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Emily

Just FYI about Emily, the source only says that it's the opening film of the Platform Prize program, not that it's the opening film of the entire festival (which has already been announced as The Swimmers). Accordingly, we don't even know yet whether Emily will premiere on September 8, because Platform might not start until a bit later in the week -- we're going to have to wait until the full schedule is released on August 23 before we know what exact day Emily will premiere on. Bearcat (talk) 14:44, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify. I saw that the TIFF premiere was added by another user in the Release section of the article. So, I added the TIFF premiere to the infobox and the intro accordingly. Admittedly, I should have further checked the source in the Release section. I only read on social media that Emily would be premiering at TIFF, but not the specifics. Thanks for making your changes though. Draco9904 (talk) 07:48, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Undated films section.

Hello. My name is ZX2006XZ. I noticed that on List of 20th Century Studios films and List of Paramount Pictures films (2020–2029), some films in the undated films section are listed with the year 2023. For example, in the undated films section of List of 20th Century Studios films, Boston Strangler, No One Will Save You, and White Men Can't Jump have the year 2023 next to them even though they are not confirmed to be released in that year.

For List of Paramount Pictures films (2020–2029), films in the undated section that have 2023 next to it are Apartment 7A, the Untitled Pet Sematary prequel, and Under the Boardwalk, whose link is now "Under the Boardwalk (2023 film)".

I couldn't find any sources of these films coming in 2023, as it has not been confirmed if any of them are coming next year, so I have decided to move them to the TBA part of the undated films section.

ZX2006XZ (talk) 13:16, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of American films of 2023, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scott Evans.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited May December, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Travis Scott

There seems to be a standard way of doing things, but at this point, to have Travis Scott listed the way he is just looks weird in List of American films of 2023 under Circus Maximus. Is there a way to word it so people won't be confused?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:18, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since every other film is listed in this standard formatting, I don't think there should be much confusion. However, if you'd like, you/I could add an invisible disclaimer that clarifies that he is the star of the film, similar to the disclaimer about A24 being the film's production company, to prevent any unwanted or unverifiable changes. Draco9904 (talk) 23:42, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That works.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:10, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to List of TriStar Pictures films, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Always check your work after making an edit, that includes checking the reference(s) you added. Isaidnoway (talk) 14:56, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, I'm 98Tigerius. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kung Fu Panda 4 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ♒️ 98TIGERIUS 🐯 21:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't remove any content. If anything, I added content as I was expanding the introduction. Draco9904 (talk) 22:22, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Saltburn (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. That Tired Tarantula (talk) 11:27, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We Live in Time

Thank you. I didn't understand the film not being there and I asked on two different talk pages. No one bothered to respond and the edit summary reverting me earlier didn't include anything.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 23:21, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]