Talk:The Newgate Calendar

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tone

I've read only abridged versions, but the main body, especially the 4th para, reeks of 'presentism' and arguably gives a false impression of the Calendar as a political tract. As regards drunkenness, gambling, extravagance and unspecified 'dissipation' and 'vice', they're common precursors to crime and it's reasonable that the Calendar makes an attempt to show the proximate causes of crime. But primarily, it's a work of its time. The French get a bad press because they were then longstanding rivals and enemies of Britain. Attitudes toward Catholics reflect the times, no matter how dated they seem now.

I'm not sure how to fix this, other than to say, as I note above, that it's a document of its time. We read (for example) the works of Jane Austen, with their social commentary incorporating prejudices that are equally out of date, without criticizing her for not writing according to modern sensibilities. An encyclopedia that views past events through the lens of 'weren't things awful back then?' is of limited value. Chrismorey (talk) 16:46, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]