Talk:The Mountain and the Viper

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject A Song of Ice and Fire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of A Song of Ice and Fire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.A Song of Ice and FireWikipedia:WikiProject A Song of Ice and FireTemplate:WikiProject A Song of Ice and FireA Song of Ice and Fire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage High‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

No bones

As of now, this is original research. But if anyone comes across mention that the way Ramsay says krakens have no bones is remarkably similar to the way Nigel from Spinal Tap says it about tuna, it'd be worth noting. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:24, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on Oathkeeper

There's an RS-related RfC on Oathkeeper. Participation and fresh voices would be welcome. The matter concerns a single-line reference to the chapters upon which the episode was based. Darkfrog24 (talk) 22:14, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Is Westeros.org an expert SPS?

There is an RfC at Oathkeeper regarding whether the site Westeros.org meets the criteria for an expert self-published source (and is therefore suitable for use on Wikipedia). It is being cited as a source for the statement "This episode was based on [specific chapters of] [specific book]." This article is likely to be affected by the outcome. Participation is welcome. Darkfrog24 (talk) 23:51, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, things with wide-reaching consquences should be discussed somewhere central, like Talk:Game of Thrones. Also, epic battles of will to power are best served with sex, violence and much fine-tuning. This one is getting way too long, and this is unwelcoming to new participants (which is why I say this here instead).

Certainly, Charles Dance himself will not be offering his counsel, as even the good books were apparently too long for him. If we don't have his assurances, what do we have? Words, like the ones Mark Addy wrote for Sean Bean, before Lena Headey tore them up. Then it's Conleth Hill's kind of chaos more often than Aiden Gillen's sort. InedibleHulk (talk) 04:57, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Should the article state which chapters appear in the episode?

The RfC concerning Westeros.org was closed with the result that the value of the disputed text should be addressed separately. This RfC is meant to determine whether Game of Thrones episode articles should have a statement like "This episode was based on [specific chapters] of [specific book]" in the body text. The outcome of this RfC is likely to affect all Game of Thrones episode articles. Participation is greatly appreciated. Darkfrog24 (talk) 21:55, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Analysis of Orson Lannister scene

Should this be in the article? It seems to be the most piece of noteworthy real-world information related to the topic, and our article at present is pretty bare and could use some secondary-sourced analysis. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 22:24, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]