Talk:The Light (newspaper)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Light (newspaper) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dr. Richard House
[edit]Any sources lauding "Dr Richard House" should note that he is not a medical doctor. His qualifications are in counselling and psychotherapy, making him unqualified to offer serious commentary on vaccines or Covid-19:
MrEarlGray (talk) 12:33, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 18 April 2023
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Vernon Coleman is not a conspiracy theorist 2405:6E00:3181:7300:F53D:D219:708E:5D01 (talk) 12:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Lightoil (talk) 12:40, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- If Vernon Coleman is "not a conspiracy theorist", then the Pope is "not a Catholic"; and no, that isn't yet another conspiracy theory! CatNip48 (talk) 21:44, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Darren Nesbitt or Nesbit ?
[edit]One may be a typographic error... Wisdood (talk) 16:46, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- BBC has Nesbit; see https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65821747 Nedrutland (talk) 19:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Misinformation
[edit]The term referencing this as a Far-right paper is incorrect and can’t be edited. Misinfo-Killer (talk) 05:55, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- The article is protected because people keep removing that well-referenced statement. If anybody wants to show via references to reliable sourcing that it is incorrect, they are welcome to being them here for discussion, rather than simply saying it's wrong and removing it. Acroterion (talk) 12:54, 25 August 2024 (UTC)