Talk:The Legend of Boo-Kini Bottom

The Legend of Boo-Kini Bottom was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 12, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Television: Episode coverage / Nickelodeon Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Nickelodeon task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Animation: American / Television / SpongeBob SquarePants Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the SpongeBob SquarePants work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

GA Review

Unsuccessful. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 20:10, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Legend of Boo-Kini Bottom/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Dr.Swag Lord: Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk · contribs) Hi, I'll review this. 10:24, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Main concern 1: The short length of the article is concerning to me. After doing a quick search, there are plenty of sources the nominator could have used to broaden the article [1][2][3][4][5]. As of now, the article falls short of criterion 3. It would need to beefed up considerably.

Main concern 2: I find a number of the sources used in this article questionable. The following sources do not appear to have proper editorial control, making them questionable:

allhallowsgeek (cited 1 time)
therockfather.com (cited 1 time)
thejoyofmovies (cited 2 times)
bubbleblabber (cited 1 time): Per a prior discussion, articles written by Daniel Kurland may be regarded as reliable, but he is not the author in this case.
showbuzzdaily.com (cited 1 time)

Together, such sources make up almost half of the sources used in the article. Per WP:QF criterion 1, I would need to fail this article as it is a long way from meeting multiple GA criteria. I wish the nominator luck on improving the article in the future! Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 20:10, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.