Talk:The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 2

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 2 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:

November 15 to 21, 2015 (21st)
November 22 to 28, 2015 (15th)

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[List of The Hunger Games characters#75th Hunger Games (3rd Quarter Quell)|Beetee]] The anchor (#75th Hunger Games (3rd Quarter Quell)) has been deleted by other users before.
[[List of The Hunger Games characters#Mrs. Everdeen|Katniss’s mother]] The anchor (#Mrs. Everdeen) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Cast footnotes

Now that Mockingjay - Part 1 has been released, do we really need footnotes to justify members of the cast who appeared in Part 1? I plan to delete them in a few days unless someone objects. BeIsKr (talk) 06:49, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't believe they're needed any more. Gloss 07:33, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hearing no other comments, I made the changes. If I accidentally deleted a reference for a character who doesn't appear in Part 1, feel free to reinsert it. BeIsKr (talk) 20:41, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Connection to awards

An odd distinction: though the film won no Oscars at all, its cast includes 4 Oscar winners: Jennifer Lawrence, Julianne Moore, Philip Seymour Hoffman, and Mahershala Ali.

2601:C2:201:4612:78D8:CFA4:C94C:2A50 (talk) 03:17, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

More pictures and action shots would enhance the article. -- Narnia.Gate7 (talk) 00:56, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Of an unreleased film? We'll get right on that. Elizium23 (talk) 04:04, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources needed for cast, etc.

Since this film is yet unreleased, we need reliable secondary sources for cast members who haven't been in the other films. Likewise for other data about this film. Remember that WP:V is policy. Elizium23 (talk) 16:40, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already released in Australia

This film has already been released in Australia and I've just seen it. Would it violate any policy for me to add the full plot to the article now? (PS: I think it's wonderful justice that we, who usually have to wait months or even a year for things after they're released in America, get this major American film first). Colonial Overlord (talk) 13:10, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, go ahead. Keep in mind WP:FILMPLOT. Lapadite (talk) 03:06, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Approximate numbers for gross and budget

Per MOS:LARGENUM, the consensus for WP:FILM articles is that we round the numbers for budgets and gross earnings. Please do not change without WP:CONSENSUS here. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 22:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edits of this day

I reviewed the article for information regarding filming production details, given the death of Hoffman, and found that the lead repeatedly introduced new unsourced information contrary to policy. While some information of the lede and info box appear in the main body, much does not (full description of film, writers, etc.), and some that does, appears without sources (cast, release format details, etc.). Per WP policy, the lede and info boxes are to summarize sourced body content (not replace such, and not to serve as a way to skirt WP:VERIFY, and wikilinking does not satisfy sourcing requirements. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 14:50, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Length of film plot

Per WP:FILMPLOT, plot summaries are to be between 400-700 words in prose length. The summary currently stands at 739 words, which means it can use a bit of tightening. However, what will not be tolerated is bloat. If you add on to the current plot and cause it to grow longer, expect to be reverted. More detail cannot be added without taking something else away, or adjusting scope and perspective to properly accommodate complexities while remaining succinct and concise. Thank you for your cooperation! Elizium23 (talk) 01:44, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

Do we really still need references for the cast? The film is out there's no longer a question about it, lol. Scream4man (talk) 01:08, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]