Talk:The Glee Club
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on January 26, 2008. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 29 November 2016
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved 'The Glee Club (comedy club)' to 'The Glee Club' and 'The Glee Club' to 'The Glee Club (band)'. Cúchullain presented evidence showing that club is primary topic. (non-admin closure) Fuortu (talk) 21:24, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
The Glee Club (comedy club) → The Glee Club – The venues don't just feature comedy, and the chain appears to have far greater notability than the band. Unreal7 (talk) 22:41, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose – the proposed target is taken, and "greater notability" is not a thing, certainly just justification for a primarytopic grab. Dicklyon (talk) 01:50, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose – the proposed target is taken, and no evidence that the UK chain passes both WP:Primary Topic requirements. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:23, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Would support the move (reverted per Dicklyon comment above) of The Glee Club → The Glee Club (band) provided all the links to are fixed, and redirect baseline The Glee Club to Glee Club (disambiguation). The isn't distinctive here. In ictu oculi (talk)
- Support, and move the band to The Glee Club (band). This RM has become confused due to a reverted move of The Glee Club (band) back to the base name The Glee Club here. However, there's no indication that the band is WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, and in fact the evidence shows that it's not: The club receives 73% of the page views despite the band being at the base name.[1] This suggests that a significant number of readers are being sent to the band's article. This is a WP:TWODABS situation, where one topic is far more viewed than the other.--Cúchullain t/c 21:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support as per Cuchullain. Tiggerjay (talk) 00:58, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.