Talk:The Game (mind game)/GA3

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TheQ Editor (talk · contribs) 21:11, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this. It'll be sad how many times I will lose the game while reviewing it though. Expect at most a week for me to finish reviewing this. Thanks, ΤheQ Editor ^Talk? 21:11, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

"in several different countries" should be "in different countries"

Done

"A number of tactics" - should be "Tactics"

Done

Gameplay

FN 3 doesn't say anything about "However, one reported variation states that The Game ends..."

It says "some players claim it ends only when the prime minister announces The Game is up on TV" — I've changed the article to read However, some players state that The Game ends when the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom announces on television that "The Game is up."

Don't all strategies focus on making others lose?

Removed the word "most"

Last few sentences of paragraph 1 in Strategies is uncited.

Okay, I've changed that section slightly.

In here, it states another variation is that if you completely forget about The Game, then you win.

Mentioned.

"several petitions" should be "petitions"

Done

Origins

"did not fit with "game theory"" should be "did not fit with the "game theory""

Done

"Paul Taylor in 2002" should be "Paul Taylor in August 2002"

Done

Psychology

"There are many early examples" - should be "There are early examples"

Done

Reception

"Several newspapers" should be "newspapers"

Done

""You lose The Game"" - should be ""You Lose The Game"" according to the sign.

Done

Other

Would it be helpful if you link to Paradox too in the See Also section?

Nice idea — I've added it.

FN 12 resulted in a connection failure. Sources do not have to be online but if it can be fixed, then it would be even better.

The site only seems to have changed addresses very recently... anyway, I've fixed it.

I was able to review this quickly due to its size and most of the sources are online. Once the issues are fixed, I will have another look through. If there are no other problems spotted, then it gets promoted! Thanks, ΤheQ Editor ^Talk? 22:03, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've responded to your comments. Bilorv ^(Talk)_(Contribs) 22:59, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

They forgot to mention it above, but the TheQ formally passed the article at 21:12, 12 November 2014‎. — $Llywelyn II$ 13:11, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]