Talk:The Galloping Ghost (aircraft)

List of surviving North American P-51 Mustangs

List of surviving North American P-51 Mustangs should be modified so this plane can be permanently on the list. otherwise, over time, the list will be reduced to zero listings. once notable, always notable.(mercurywoodrose)75.61.134.173 (talk) 04:39, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

What? 'Notable' and 'surviving' are two entirely different concepts. AndyTheGrump (talk) 04:50, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Yes, you are right, notable as in deserving their own separate article, is different than merely surviving. This plane DID survive for 60 years, and even if it had just fallen off a truck, it deserves a place in the list, with the list being retitled so that planes surviving into, say, the 70's (making them vintage aircraft) are listed. mercurywoodrose75.61.134.173 (talk) 10:31, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

No, the plane's gone and destroyed. The survivor list is for aircraft that presently still exist. I think this one's pretty much classified as "no longer existing". 98.125.69.176 (talk) 19:30, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

More infomation of the modifications

I found an article that says some of the details of the modifications of The Galloping Ghost. However, I am not completely sure if it should be added. Source: http://www.sportaviationonline.org/sportaviation/201105#pg41 204.106.252.64 (talk) 04:56, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

• I think this is relevant as those modifications will become the topics of close review for all of those involved.

WPPilot 15:46, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

• • What is intresting are the photos that show no pilots helmet, in the cockpit, moments before impact. The Youtube Video has the pilot explaining that the pilots helmet is pushed hard upon the canopy, and other photos and video show just that, yet it looks like moments before impact the pilot might have blacked out. WPPilot 16:08, 17 September 2011 (UTC) (talk)
    • I did not know anything abouut the helmet, minus the face that the canopy needed to be modified to allow him to have space to wear one. In any case, thank you for finding a way to add the reference to the article. 204.106.252.64 (talk) 19:38, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

• This is a graph, that I just pulled from the Dago Red page, on Wikipedia, and it needs mod to insert into this page. remember the data below is from dago red, PLEASE HELP CONVERT THE DATA TO REFLECT THE SPECS, for this aircraft, here, on the talk page and then lets insert it onto the main page herein on this story. That should keep the people that want this all included in the same story at bay.WPPilot 20:12, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Specifications (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dago_Red)

{{aircraft specifications <!-- if you do not understand how to use this template, please ask at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft]] --> <!-- please answer the following questions --> |plane or copter?=plane |jet or prop?=prop <!-- Now, fill out the specs. Please include units where appropriate (main comes first, alt in parentheses). If an item doesn't apply, like capacity, leave it blank. For additional lines, end your alt units with a right parenthesis ")" and start a new, fully-formatted line beginning with an asterisk "*" --> |crew=1 |length main=33 ft 0 in |length alt=10 m |span main=32 ft 6 in |span alt=9.9 m |height main=13 ft 0 in |height alt=3.96 m |area main=150 ft² |area alt=13.9 m² |empty weight main=7,200 lb |empty weight alt=3,266 kg |loaded weight main=7,800 lb |loaded weight alt=3,538 kg |max takeoff weight main=8,500 lb |max takeoff weight alt=3,855 kg |engine (prop)=Packard V-1650-7 liquid-cooled supercharged V-12 (USA licensed version of the Rolls Royce Merlin engine) |type of prop=Hamilton Standard paddle blade |number of props=1 |power main=Classified |power alt= |max speed main=520+ mph |max speed alt=840+ km/h |range main=120 miles (at race power) |range alt=193 km |ceiling main=45,000 ft |ceiling alt=13,716 m |climb rate main=8,000 ft/min |climb rate alt= 2,438 m/min |loading main=<!-- lb/ft² --> |loading alt=<!-- kg/m² --> |power/mass main=<!-- hp/lb --> |power/mass alt=<!-- W/kg --> }}

if anyone would care to assist much of the data for the Galloping Ghost is already in the media..WPPilot 20:10, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

• Some of the information here might help, such as the speed of the aircraft. Link: http://www2.leewardairranch.com/racing/results?op0=%3D&filter0=&op1=OR&op2=OR&op3=OR&filter3%5B%5D=**ALL**&op4=OR 204.106.252.64 (talk) 21:26, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Found some more info while looking up something else. 204.106.252.64 (talk) 05:47, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Year of manufacture

Does the prefix to the serial number (i.e. "44") not indicate that the aircraft was manufactured in 1944, not 1946 as is reported in the article? 68.144.172.8 (talk) 05:15, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

I can find anything that can be sited at the moment, but I do believe that you are correct. Until someone can prove that it could not be built in 1946, I don't think it should be changed. 204.106.252.64 (talk) 05:47, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

P-51 C ? Engine- Packard V-1650-7 liquid-cooled supercharged V-12

The aircraft appears to be a ' highly race modified' P-51 C with the 'Razor back canopy' of the C being replaced by a modern flip up canopy, rather than the model with Bubble top canopy of the D models. The engine is listed as being a Packard V-1650-7 liquid-cooled supercharged V-12, the US version of the Merlin engine. I guess the air scoop had been removed to improve stream lining? Atmamatma (talk) 08:41, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

According to Leeward's website, they completely removed the radiators and the belly cowling. Instead, they have a tank filled with a water/alcohol mixture and a heat exchanger for both the engine coolant and oil, and the water slowly evaporates off as the airplane is running. You can see the steam being jettisoned from the plane in certain aerial shots of it. Wolftengu (talk) 16:41, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

There is proof that it was a P-51D under the merger section on the Reno Air Races disaster talk page and in this article. 204.106.252.64 (talk) 00:35, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Video appearance/s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cibf4FY6-PU&feature=related (one of the Mustangs) Atmamatma (talk) 09:20, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

History

I've written the aircraft's racing history, as it was a very historic racing aircraft, with a racing history going back to the Thompson Trophy Races. It you want more references, I have tons, but I am away from home and they will have to wait until I get back. Aeroweanie (talk)

What is WAA?

At the present time, there is a sentence that begins 'Beville was able to secure the aircraft from the WAA despite a deadline that had already passed..' without any prior reference of what those initials stand for. There is a disambiguation page for WAA, but none seem to fit. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WAA Grandma Roses (talk) 21:55, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

I believe that it means Wartime Aircraft Activity, though I do not have total proof on that at the moment despite the name pointing towards it being likely considering that occured near the end of World War II. 204.106.252.64 (talk) 00:30, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

"WAA" stands for War Assets Administration - the bureau that was created after WWII to dispose of surplus war equipment and material; you can read about it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Assets_Administration.

Huh, I looked up the acronym with a search engine and I still was wrong. Though, I never came across it online until you mentioned it. 204.106.252.126 (talk) 02:17, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Spectre or Specter?

I was trying to improve the spelling and grammar of the article, when I came across an issue. In 1983, Jimmy Leeward bought the aircraft and either named it Spectre or Specter. A internet search gives both versions as the correct spelling in several places. 204.106.252.126 (talk) 02:52, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Interesting - it was Specter! http://www.mustangsmustangs.com/p-51/survivors/pages/picfiles/44-15651/44-15651_15_es1.jpg Aeroweanie (talk) 22:05, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Damaged "hulk" or "hull"?

I'm wondering if the term "damaged hulk" in the reference and carried forward to this article is a typo. I'm a pilot and multiple aircraft owner and I've never heard the term "hulk" but "hull" is a common term. --RobertGary1 (talk) 22:24, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Possible copyright problem

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)