Talk:The Fourth Horseman (Millennium)

Untitled

This was missing: * When naming the capitals of Europe ("we have confirmed cases in Bonn, Amsterdam, Rome and Madrid; we have suspected cases in London and Athens"), the Stargate team obviously used a sixteen-year old map of Europe, before the capital of Germany was moved from the small town of Bonn to Germany's major metropolis, Berlin. Don't see why, so back in now. --Flammingo^Hey 17:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Because they weren't naming European capitals, just infected cities. JBK405 23:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

In one part of the epp, Dr Lee is testing stuff for the anti-prior device using "Dark Pariah", what is the real song name and artist of that song? --Heruur 18:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Uh...you just said the title is "Dark Pariah". JBK405 03:17, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Changed town name to Waterloo. I'm watching this episode now and it was incorrectly named in the original article. 666-93-666 (talk) 22:02, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Fourth Horseman (Millennium)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 18:56, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: GRAPPLE X

Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 18:56, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

1: Well-written

• a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
• b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

WP:LEAD:

Check for WP:LEAD: Check for Correct Structure of Lead Section:  Done Check for Citations (WP:LEADCITE):  Done Check for Introductory text:  Done Check for Provide an accessible overview (MOS:INTRO):  Done Major Point 1: Plot "In this episode, offender profiler Frank Black (Lance Henriksen) investigates the initial outbreak of a deadly virus, and discovers that his employers, the Millennium Group may pose a danger to his safety." (summarised well in the lead) Major Point 2: Production "The episode was written by Glen Morgan and James Wong, and directed by Dwight Little." & "The Fourth Horseman" was written under the belief that the series would soon be cancelled, and inspired in part by the outbreak of bovine spongiform encephalopathy in the United Kingdom." (summarised well in the lead) Major Point 3: Broadcast and reception "It premiered on the Fox network on May 8, 1998." & "The episode has earned positive responses from critics, and was seen by approximately 4.61 million households during its initial broadcast." (summarised well in the lead) Check for Relative emphasis:  Done Major Point 1: Plot "In this episode, offender profiler Frank Black (Lance Henriksen) investigates the initial outbreak of a deadly virus, and discovers that his employers, the Millennium Group may pose a danger to his safety." (the lead gives due weight as is given in the body) Major Point 2: Production "The episode was written by Glen Morgan and James Wong, and directed by Dwight Little." & "The Fourth Horseman" was written under the belief that the series would soon be cancelled, and inspired in part by the outbreak of bovine spongiform encephalopathy in the United Kingdom." (the lead gives due weight as is given in the body) Major Point 3: Broadcast and reception "It premiered on the Fox network on May 8, 1998." & "The episode has earned positive responses from critics, and was seen by approximately 4.61 million households during its initial broadcast." (the lead gives due weight as is given in the body) Check for Opening paragraph (MOS:BEGIN):  Done Check for First sentence (WP:LEADSENTENCE):  Done "The Fourth Horseman" is the twenty-second episode of the second season of the American crime-thriller television series Millennium. Check for Format of the first sentence (MOS:BOLDTITLE):  Done Check for Proper names and titles:  Done Check for Abbreviations and synonyms (MOS:BOLDSYN): None Check for Foreign language (MOS:FORLANG): None Check for Pronunciation: None Check for Contextual links (MOS:CONTEXTLINK):  Done Check for Biographies: NA Check for Organisms: NA Check for Biographies of living persons: NA Check for Alternative names (MOS:LEADALT):  Done Check for Non-English titles: Check for Usage in first sentence: Check for Separate section usage: Check for Length (WP:LEADLENGTH):  Done Check for Clutter (WP:LEADCLUTTER): None

WP:LAYOUT:

Done Check for WP:LAYOUT:  Done Check for Body sections: WP:BODY, MOS:BODY.  Done Check for Headings and sections:  Done Check for Section templates and summary style:  Done Check for Paragraphs (MOS:PARAGRAPHS):  Done Paragraphs should be short enough to be readable, but long enough to develop an idea. (WP:BETTER) Fix short paragraphs. Check for Standard appendices and footers (MOS:APPENDIX):  Done Check for Order of sections (WP:ORDER):  Done Check for Works or publications:  Done Check for See also section (MOS:SEEALSO):  Done Check for Notes and references (WP:FNNR):  Done Check for Further reading (WP:FURTHER):  Done Check for External links (WP:LAYOUTEL):  Done Check for Links to sister projects:  Done Check for Navigation templates:  Done Check for Formatting:  Done Check for Images (WP:LAYIM):  Done Check for Links:  Done Check for Horizontal rule (WP:LINE):  Done

WP:WTW:

Done Check for WP:WTW:  Done Check for Words that may introduce bias:  Done Check for Puffery (WP:PEA):  Done Check for Contentious labels (WP:LABEL):  Done Check for Unsupported attributions (WP:WEASEL):  Done Check for Expressions of doubt (WP:ALLEGED):  Done Check for Editorializing (MOS:OPED):  Done Check for Synonyms for said (WP:SAY):  Done Check for Expressions that lack precision:  Done Check for Euphemisms (WP:EUPHEMISM):  Done Check for Clichés and idioms (WP:IDIOM):  Done Check for Relative time references (WP:REALTIME):  Done Check for Neologisms (WP:PEA): None Check for Offensive material (WP:F***):  Done Check for WP:MOSFICT:  Done Check for Real-world perspective (WP:Real world):  Done Check for Primary and secondary information (WP:PASI):  Done Check for Contextual presentation (MOS:PLOT):  Done

WP:EMBED:
Done Prose is preferred over list (WP:PROSE): Check for Tables (MOS:TABLES):

2: Verifiable with no original research

• a. Has an appropriate reference section: Yes
• b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: excellent (Thorough check on Google. Cross-checked with other FAs)

WP:RS:

Done Check for WP:RS:  Done Cross-checked with other FAs: Episode 14 (Twin Peaks), Gender Bender (The X-Files), Deep Throat (The X-Files episode), Episode 2 (Twin Peaks) & Squeeze (The X-Files) Check for the material (WP:RSVETTING): (not contentious)  Done Is it contentious?: No Does the ref indeed support the material?: Check for the author (WP:RSVETTING):  Done Who is the author?: Does the author have a Wikipedia article?: What are the author's academic credentials and professional experience?: What else has the author published?: Is the author, or this work, cited in other reliable sources? In academic works?: Check for the publication (WP:RSVETTING):  Done Check for Self-published sources (WP:SPS):

WP:MINREF:
Done Check for inline citations WP:MINREF:  Done Check for Direct quotations:  Done Check for Likely to be challenged:  Done Check for Contentious material about living persons (WP:BLP): NA

• c. No original research:  Done

WP:NOR:
Done Check for primary sources (WP:PRIMARY):  Done Check for synthesis (WP:SYN):  Done Check for original images (WP:OI):  Done

3: Broad in its coverage

a. Major aspects:

Done Cross-checked with other FAs: Episode 14 (Twin Peaks), Gender Bender (The X-Files), Deep Throat (The X-Files episode), Episode 2 (Twin Peaks) & Squeeze (The X-Files) Check for Article scope as defined by reliable sources: Check for The extent of the subject matter in these RS: Check for Out of scope: Check for The range of material that belongs in the article: Check for All material that is notable is covered: Check for All material that is referenced is covered: Check for All material that a reader would be likely to agree matches the specified scope is covered: Check for The most general scope that summarises essentially all knowledge: Check for Stay on topic and no wandering off-topic (WP:OFFTOPIC):

b. Focused:
Done Check for Readability issues (WP:LENGTH): Check for Article size (WP:TOO LONG!):

4: Neutral

WP:NPOV:

Done 4. Fair representation without bias:  Done Check for POV (WP:YESPOV):  Done Check for naming (WP:POVNAMING):  Done Check for structure (WP:STRUCTURE):  Done Check for Due and undue weight (WP:DUE):  Done Check for Balancing aspects (WP:BALASPS):  Done Check for Giving "equal validity" (WP:VALID):  Done Check for Balance (WP:YESPOV):  Done Check for Impartial tone (WP:IMPARTIAL):  Done Check for Describing aesthetic opinions (WP:SUBJECTIVE):  Done Check for Words to watch (WP:YESPOV):  Done Check for Attributing and specifying biased statements (WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV):  Done Check for Fringe theories and pseudoscience (WP:PSCI): None Check for Religion (WP:RNPOV): None

5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes

6: Images  Done (None)

Images:

Done 6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  Done Check for copyright tags (WP:TAGS):  Done Check for copyright status:  Done Check for non-free content (WP:NFC):  Done Check for valid fair use rationales (WP:FUR):  Done 6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  Done Check for image relevance (WP:IMAGE RELEVANCE):  Done Check for Images for the lead (WP:LEADIMAGE):  Done Check for suitable captions (WP:CAPTION):  Done

Grapple X, I'm very happy and inspired to see your work here. I do have some insights based on the above checklist that I think will improve the article:

• I think the layout needs to be fixed.

Besides that, I think the article looks excellent. All the best, --Seabuckthorn ♥ 23:11, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick review! Which paragraphs do you feel should be rearranged? I've tried to keep separate subjects separated, especially major scene changes in the plot section, but I could probably merge some of them together. GRAPPLE X 00:27, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, Grapple X, very much for writing such excellent articles. I feel that the last paragraph of the plot section "That night, Black answers a ..." can be merged with the previous one. But I'd leave that to your good judgement. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 22:44, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Done and done. Thanks for the review! GRAPPLE X 23:02, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Promoting the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 22:44, 19 February 2014 (UTC)