Talk:The Flying Karamazov Brothers

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I merged this article from The flying karamazov brothers... Eliot 19:58, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hype

Quite a bit of hype here: "world famous… extremely popular… rocketed to international fame". We rarely use language that strong in talking even about someone like Brad Pitt or the Rolling Stones. - Jmabel | Talk 07:56, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). Dismas|^(talk) 12:18, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know that. I'm an admin. Usually I prefer to let whoever has been working on the article have a shot at toning this sort of thing down rather than come in with an axe, but if you prefer I will do the latter. - Jmabel | Talk 04:07, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lawsuit

This section should be removed. None of the supposed sources seem to contain any of the information in the section. Instead, they point back to previous references which are about other things. One of the references is to a LinkedIn item, which is only available to members, therefore, not open to easy verification. If the information contained in this section is true, it needs better sourcing. The only source I can find is a single New York Post article with no follow-ups. Theonemacduff (talk) 16:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct Theonemacduff. If you want to wait a day or so to see if anyone else responds that would be okay but it could be removed now as well. As you are the one who did the research you should do the honors in removing the material as you see fit. MarnetteD|Talk 17:11, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]