User talk:Theonemacduff
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
[edit]
|
Althusser
[edit]Hi I read your comments on the talk of Louis Althusser and I added a bit of the Judt quote to the article. I wondered if you could find Thompson's critque of him online, or a quote or review, or if you have it, as the article mentions his polemic but doesn't explain what his problems with Althusser's work are. special, random, Merkinsmum 22:48, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Why sources should be cited
[edit]Good question. I hope the following helps a bit. Wikipedia is by its very nature a work by people with widely different knowledge and skills. The reader needs to be assured that the material within it is reliable: this is especially important where statements are made about controversial issues or living persons. The purpose of citing your sources is:
- To improve the credibility of Wikipedia.
- To avoid claims of plagiarism.
- To show that your edit is not original research and to reduce editorial disputes.
- To ensure that the content of articles can be checked by any reader or editor.
- To help users find additional information on the topic.
- To ensure that material about living persons complies with Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons.
- For how to write citations, see Wikipedia:Citing sources
The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged should be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation. When content in Wikipedia requires direct substantiation, the established convention is to provide an inline citation to the supporting references. The rationale is that this provides the most direct means to verify whether the content is consistent with the references. Alternative conventions exist, and are acceptable when they provide clear and precise attribution for the article's assertions, but inline citations are considered "best practice" under this rationale. For more details, please consult Wikipedia:Citing_sources#How_to_cite_sources. The source should be cited clearly and precisely to enable readers to find the text that supports the article content in question.
If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.
Any edit lacking a reliable source may be removed, but editors may object if you remove material without giving them a chance to provide references. If you want to request a source for an unsourced statement, consider moving it to the talk page. Alternatively, you may tag a sentence by adding the {{fact}} template, a section with {{unreferencedsection}}, or the article with {{refimprove}} or {{unreferenced}}. Use the edit summary to give an explanation of your edit. You may also leave a note on the talk page or an invisible HTML comment on the article page.
Do not leave unsourced information in articles about living persons. As Jimmy Wales has put it:
I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons.
–Jimmy Wales [1]
File:Valdy performing in 1976.jpg
[edit]Hi, thanks for uploading File:Valdy performing in 1976.jpg. Unfortunately, according to our image use policy, we will only be able to use this image if it gets released under a fully free license. As it is your own work, would you be willing to release it in this way (i.e. allowing free re-use elsewhere)? If yes, you can indicate this by simply placing the tag "{{cc-by-sa-3.0}}" on the file page. If not, I'm afraid we'll have to delete the image again. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:58, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Valdy performing in 1976.jpg)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Valdy performing in 1976.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Replaceable fair use File:Valdy performing in 1976.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Valdy performing in 1976.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:57, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
-- John of Reading (talk) 20:55, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
-- John of Reading (talk) 08:37, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Fun isn't it - you upload a new image and it don't change - join the club. Only it does, but for some reason the file image page don't show it for some time - even purging and refreshing fail to wake it up. Anyway, the image was on commons as well, so I've moved you colour corrected copy to the commons image, and deleted all the en-wiki ones. If you are lucky, by the time you read this it might have updated! - if not just click the image on the file page to see the real saved image. Ronhjones (Talk) 17:49, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
WW1 & The Cranes are flying?
[edit]Hi there,
in this Soviet film it is I believe the case that the young woman searches for her soldier in a convoy leaving for WWII, right? Now, I just saw a US WWI film fragment where the actress (could be Mary Pickford, don't know for sure) actually does find her man. Do you know whether the Cranes are Flying is playing with that earlier US film or not? It could also be that the leaving soldiers is a rather generic scene used in many war films. 83.83.1.229 (talk) 19:37, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, only just saw this. Departure of soldiers is certainly generic. In Cranes are Flying, I was referencing the ending of the film, soldiers returning. The young lady realizes that her boyfriend is not coming back with the others, that he has been killed. She transmutes her sorrow by giving away the flowers of welcome she had brought with her to other soldiers, more or less randomly. As to double bills, I've no idea what other films it has been paired with. Long ago, when I saw it, it was on a double bill with Tarkovsky's Andrey Rubilov (not sure of the spelling of that name), totally different film. Sorry I can't be more help. Theonemacduff (talk) 07:26, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Theonemacduff. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Theonemacduff. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Theonemacduff. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
- ^ Jimmy Wales (2006-05-16). ""Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information"". WikiEN-l electronic mailing list archive. Retrieved 2006-06-11.