Talk:The Filth and the Fury

Fair use rationale for Image:Filthandthefury.jpg

Image:Filthandthefury.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Bill Grundy interview was ONLY shown in London

(How many times do we in the provinces have to keep pointing this out?) The notorious Bill Grundy interview on the Today show in 1976 was ONLY shown in London via a Thames TV regional opt-out. So it was not shown on "ITV" (i.e. the full network) as the article currently says. It was only on the `ITV' channel in London.

(The fact that the TV interview indeed made national headlines in Fleet Street newspapers suggests either a very London-centric attitude by them at the time or that music industry orchestration issues were at work).

What are you talking about??? Punk rock was entirely a London phenomenon and The Buzzcocks, Magazine and Joy Division never existed, let alone The Skids. Per$1$tenceofv1$1on (talk) 19:45, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Per$1$tenceofv1$1on

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Filth and the Fury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20130105045140/http://www.themightyorgan.com/features_filth.html to http://www.themightyorgan.com/features_filth.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:12, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Dodgy Source

Looking for citations to add, I came across this, uploaded recently in Far Out magazine. I think any Wikipedia editors trying to flesh this article out should avoid this as a source, as it bears a suspiciously strong resemblance to what's been on Wikipedia for several years... Per$1$tenceofv1$1on (talk) 20:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Per$1$tenceofv1$1on Per$1$tenceofv1$1on (talk) 20:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

References