This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Cerebellum, hi. In a word, no.. As I said in my note on their talk page, "Particularly, every quotation needs a footnote." There are numerous quotes still without citations. In addition, if you look at WP:CIT, there is not enough information in the footnotes to pass WP:VERIFY. Onel5969TT me12:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Onel5969 I must be missing something. The quote in "Sealed Letter" is sourced to Boyce. The three quotes in "Coptic text" are all sourced to Gardner, as indicated by "Gardner published three fragments of letters". The quote in "Paraphrase in Latin and Chinese" is sourced to Jing Zang. --Cerebellum (talk) 12:37, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Cerebellum, I don't think simply attributing something to a book is sufficient. If we were sourcing something which was contained in The Iliad, we wouldn't simply put The Iliad by Homer. We'd at least require page numbers. Onel5969TT me12:49, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Onel5969 All that for AfC?? I think you and I fundamentally disagree. My reading of WP:AFCPURPOSE tells me that if an article has a >50% chance of surviving AfD, I should accept it, we can worry about content issues in mainspace. But I'm sure I won't change your mind so I'll let it go and let another reviewer decide on this particular article. --Cerebellum (talk) 13:02, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Cerebellum, If this was a spanking brand new article, I'd agree. But it had been tagged for almost two months without the issue being addressed. I'm not a big fan of perma-tagged articles. If I had passed this as "reviewed", there was every indication that this is what it would become. Onel5969TT me13:08, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]