Talk:The Culture of Narcissism

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Conservatism Mid‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Whoever added the last 2 paragraphs, you've done a beautiful job.

The reference to "somewhat conservative politics" in overview section doesn't sound right according to my memory of reading Lasch. I thought he was a Marxist, if anything. A separate comment: Perhaps this article should be merged with biographical entry on Lasch. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.11.162.168 (talk) 23:50, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sounds conservative

The explanation of the book makes Lasch sound very socially conservative. Is this true of Lasch, or is this simply the bias of the reviewer who wrote the wikiarticle? 121.73.7.84 (talk) 04:51, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct. He was a respected Neo-Marxist. The fact that he gives a rational and historical explanation for conservatism was confused with being a conservative (as he predicted). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8001:A702:13A8:511:CA8F:C876:ED28 (talk) 22:44, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]