Talk:The Conquest of Belgrade/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 17:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Happy to review. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 17:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
A beautiful article. Here are my comments:
- Lead:
- As per WP:MOSLEAD I think it's best to keep only one translation of the name in the lead. Both translated names can go to the info box.
- one art historian Can we know who?
- At places you say 1844-45, elsewhere you say 1812-1872. Consistency would be good.
- Article:
- Say either Romantic or romantic.
No copyvio issues, images properly licensed. The above points addressed I would be happy to promote this. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 15:26, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- All done, but I can't see where it says 1812-1872 for the life of me. Please help me out. Thanks, 23 editor (talk) 17:02, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- @23 editor: I found this and another instance in Background. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 17:22, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- All done, but I can't see where it says 1812-1872 for the life of me. Please help me out. Thanks, 23 editor (talk) 17:02, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, I see what you mean. I've removed it as off-topic. I thought you were saying the article mentioned the painting as being dated 1812-72. 23 editor (talk) 17:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, I believe this is ready for promotion. Great job! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 17:31, 25 April 2016 (UTC)