Talk:The Case of Wagner

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Philosophy: Literature / Continental Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Continental philosophy

Richard Wagner

This article falls within the scope of the Richard Wagner WikiProject, a collaboration to develop articles on the composer and his operas. The project talk page is a place to discuss issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!Richard WagnerWikipedia:WikiProject Richard WagnerTemplate:WikiProject Richard WagnerRichard Wagner articles

Untitled

Please help expand this page - I am attempting to fill in remaining blank entries on Nietzsche's works. I have attempted to follow the basic outline from The Antichrist (book). RobLinwood 05:57, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 14:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Off the mark

Since there is much ignorance regarding the unread Schopenhauer, the article cannot reflect Nietzsche's main criticism of Wagner. Wagner, after reading Schopenhauer, wrote operas featuring the denial of the will to live. This reflected Schopenhauer's contention that absence of willing results in goodness and release from the world's evil. Nietzsche rejected Schopenhauer's doctrine and wanted to promote life regardless of its evil characteristics. He opposed Wagner's later operas with their death wishes, Christian compassion, and self sacrifices.Lestrade (talk) 02:19, 29 October 2010 (UTC)Lestrade[reply]

Nietzsche did not write this book to criticize Wagner's involvement with the Völkisch movement or with antisemitism. Nietzsche's references to Bizet were not ironic [real meaning that is the opposite of apparent meaning]. One of Nietzsche's main criticisms, in this book, was of Wagner's emphasis on theatrical drama rather than on pure music. Schopenhauer had given music supreme importance and value in his aesthetics and Nietzsche was strongly influenced by Schopenhauer's philosophy of music.Lestrade (talk) 00:26, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Lestrade[reply]

Quotation marks

Why are "philosophical affect" and "disease" enclosed in quotation marks? What is a "philosophical affect"? When used as a noun, "affect" means "feeling" or "emotion." Is the article referring to a "philosophical feeling" or "philosophical emotion"? That is a strange concept.Lestrade (talk) 02:18, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Lestrade[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Classic and Romantic Music History

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 January 2024 and 9 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mason.Leidner, Littletree333 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Sanna Pederson Eroica sonata (talk) 14:23, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]