Talk:The Breakers

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture High‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Rhode Island Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Rhode Island portal This article is supported by WikiProject Rhode Island (assessed as High-importance).

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 September 2021 and 20 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bakerksimmons.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Flagler

The article on Henry Flagler links to here in discussing the Breakers Hotel in Palm Beach, which this obviously is not. The Palm Beach Breakers is worthy of its own article.

Public Domain ?

Is anything created by the US Gov really in the PD ? If so, we can copy verbatim from [1], which is very informative.

Yes, you could copy from this one verbatim, it's an official document. It's rather more detailed than we really want for WP though (in the same way that articles reference the results from a scientific paper, without actually including every detail of experimental methodology that the paper must include), so excerpting seems more useful than wholesale data dumping. Stan 22:57, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe it is too detailed. After all, "The Breakers" is more notable than "Sonic the Hedgehog" is, aight ? Sonic the Hedgehog and [[Category:Sonic the Hedgehog characters]] are excessively detailed. Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia.-- ExpImp^talkcon 02:16, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I now incorporated what i believe are the most important parts. if you want, you can yet salvage lots of history-factlets from it.-- ExpImp^talkcon 02:53, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there are other articles that are also excessively detailed, and there are a bunch of editors who would take a hatchet to them if not for the legions of fanboys zealously guarding every bit of drivel... Part of being a compendium of knowledge is judicious summarization, irrespective of paper or online. Stan 20:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See featured articles like Holkham Hall, Belton House or even Palace of Westminster to some extent. That level of detail would be very welcome on this article. --W.marsh 14:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Third floor still a dwelling?

Don't some of the family still live on the third floor, and most of it is off limits to tourists? --RThompson82 (talk) 09:17, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The third floor is closed to the public. Several descendents have occupancy rights. Sorry, I don't have a source though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Please Let's Not (talk • contribs) 02:39, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The family had no rights and was evicted by the Preservation Society of Newport County for expressing their opinions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.185.77.31 (talk) 04:43, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Picture Formatting

I'm not sure how to do this, but somebody needs to shrink those pictures. Right now it's overtaking the text and chopping up the interface. 24.130.3.207 (talk) 05:13, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redundancy in description of plantings

I deleted one sentence which listed the species of shrubs planted next to the terrace, since the same information is provided later in the paragraph. There's still some redundancy given that the same three species are listed two times, but since those are evidently descriptions of different parts of the grounds, I let them stand. 206.208.104.20 (talk) 12:40, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on The Breakers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:26, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect date?

The prior mansion on the site is described as burning on November 25, 1892. Then the rebuild is described, and it's stated that "Expansion was finally finished in 1892." That doesn't seem possible in 30-some days. Was it actually 1895 that expansion was finally finished? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.134.119 (talk) 04:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]