Talk:The Bounds of Sense

Philosophy: Literature / Analytic / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Analytic philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Article about Nothing

This article provides no information. However, it does further the pompous point of view that there is little contemporary value in Kant's writings. This is typical of post-MTV thought. No intelligence. I will try to add something to the article in an attempt to rescue it from its present worthlessness.69.19.14.26 23:49, 9 August 2006 (UTC)Lestrade[reply]

Lead

Recent edits to the lead make it state that The Bounds of Sense "received praise from philosophers as one of the first thorough works on the Critique of Pure Reason". The addition itself may be perfectly correct. The body of the article does not support it, however. None of the commentary on the book in the "Reception" section praises The Bounds of Sense specifically for its thoroughness. I suggest that if the "thoroughness" reference in the lead is to be kept, then supporting material should be added to the "Reception" section. Also, in case it is not clear, the manual of style reference I was trying to refer to here is WP:PEACOCK. Freeknowledgecreator (talk) 01:13, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]