Talk:The Boat Race 1895

The Boat Race 1895 has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 14, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Rowing

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rowing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rowing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RowingWikipedia:WikiProject RowingTemplate:WikiProject Rowingrowing articles

To-do list:

Featured Articles:

Raise the rowing (sport) article to featured status.
1. Get article relisted to 'good article status'
2. Put through another round of peer review, see here
3. Nominate for featured status
Ditto for Henley Royal Regatta, The Boat Race , Steve Redgrave

Stubs: see here..

Tag {{Rowing-stub}} onto all rowing stub articles so we can keep track of them.
Expand stubs to at least start class.

Image requests: see here..
Article requests: see here..

Write bios for World Rowing champions (see the redlinks in the templates)

Document FISA database errors

University of Cambridge

This article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge WikiProject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the discussion.University of CambridgeWikipedia:WikiProject University of CambridgeTemplate:WikiProject University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge articles

University of Oxford Low‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

River Thames (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames articles

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Boat Race 1895/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Montanabw (talk · contribs) 00:05, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	See below
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	See below
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

Comments: Mostly I see some need to flesh a few things out or clarify what is being said- style issues, essentially.

Lead way too short. One sentence on the actual race, plus some generic filler.
Lead expanded a touch, is it adequate? The Rambling Man (talk) 13:00, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Recommend {{frac}} templates where relevant, i.e. {{frac|2|1|4}} = 2+1⁄4
I'm going to have to decline this, I may use a special character if you prefer, e.g. ¼, but I'm not sure how accessible that is. The {{frac}} template produces such ghastly results, I couldn't possibly accommodate it... The Rambling Man (talk) 12:41, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"The rivalry is a major point of honour between the two universities, as of 2014 it is followed throughout the United Kingdom and broadcast worldwide." IMHO, a semicolon between the clauses or two separate sentences would be better structure.
Yes, I have done this. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:41, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"Oxford went into the race as reigning champions, having beaten Cambridge by three-and-a-half lengths in the previous year's race, and held the overall lead, with 28 victories to Cambridge's 22.[7]" Remind us that this was 1895, and clarify that overall lead was at that time.
I think the addition of "the 1895 race" makes it clear enough that the tally was representative of that at the time. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:41, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Second paragraph of Background section appears to be a single run on sentence from He--. (smile) You might want to flesh that out a bit. Also explain "trial eights" or link to it, that's a rowing term the uninitiated (which still includes myself) don't quite know... implied it's like a junior varsity team, but do clarify. Also, the angle that the Oxford coach was from Cambridge is one of the amusing and unique things about this race and should be something you add to the lead (which requires some bulking out anyway)
I've rephrased and added a little to the lead about R. C. Lehmann. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:00, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gah, forgot about the trial eights. It's not junior varsity, it's like the downselection process, two crews containing the "best" 16 rowers and 2 coxes race each other and the final Blue boat is selected following the race. Linked to the main BR article where this is touched upon. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:09, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm a little confused about James Brook Close - you way he was a "non-rowing president" but then mention that he rowed in previous years twenty years prior, so would all Presidents be non-rowing? Except later you note the other team's President was apparently one of the rowing team, so I'm confused.
No, most Presidents would have been undergraduates at the university and most (notwithstanding my comment below) would have rowed. It was unusual for James Brook Close to have been elected as President, I've added stuff from the only source I have which covers it in any detail, sadly I can't cite my previous sentence, but it is relatively obvious from the 160 articles that the president usually rows. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:00, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is the President of the club always also the captain of the team? - and how can this person be non-rowing sometimes? How do they compare vis a vis being a coach?
The University Boat Club President is elected by the captains of the various college boat clubs. Sometimes, a president is either injured or ill or even decides that he himself is not good enough to row in the Boat Race, so he recuses and becomes a "non-rowing president". Captains and Presidents may act as coaches as well, but that's rare because generally they're in the boat so they can't easily see what's going on. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:41, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What was the significance of being "called away" if Close wasn't rowing anyway? - sounds like for a long time?? Does "called away" have a specific meaning in these schools or in rowing - is it a Britishism? To me, "called away" means a very short-term thing, literally the time it might take to answer a phone call) ... maybe rephrase for clarity there.
Well hopefully the addition I've made will make it clear that Close had been brought in to stem the dissent. And the source doesn't cover for how long he was gone, but do remember that he would have had to take a boat to get there. And back. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:00, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"Both crews suffered variously..." Maybe open that paragraph with this phrase, then go on to discuss all the things that happened.
I've reorganised, what do you think? The Rambling Man (talk) 13:00, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that's all I can nitpick on this one. Links all check out as do refs. Proceed to fix! Montanabw ^(talk) 00:33, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Montanabw, much appreciated. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:00, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Montanabw: any chance you'd be revising this? Thanks again. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:16, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Y Sorry! Been off-wiki for most of the last week or so (just busy IRL, nothing of cosmic significance.) Your changes work for me. I'd still like a little more comprehensive lead, but that's just me talking, not the GA criteria. Good to go! Montanabw ^(talk) 23:12, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]