Talk:The Bankers of God: The Calvi Affair
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Move?
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved Mike Cline (talk) 22:32, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
The Bankers of God: The Calvi Affair → The Bankers of God –
- Unnecessary disambiguation; no other films titled The Bankers of God. The latter already redirects to the former. Fortdj33 (talk) 14:04, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
- But the subtitle is still technically part of the title, so it's not really disambiguation, just completeness. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:20, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
- Per WP:PRECISE, we should "use only as much additional detail as necessary". The subtitle is unnecessary, if there is no other article or film with that title on Wikipedia. Fortdj33 (talk) 20:00, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
- That section you quote is about disambiguation, which is not relevant here. Do we have a guideline about subtitles? Dicklyon (talk) 03:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
- Per WP:PRECISE, we should "use only as much additional detail as necessary". The subtitle is unnecessary, if there is no other article or film with that title on Wikipedia. Fortdj33 (talk) 20:00, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
- Unless it can be shown that the film is better known under the short title, I see no reason why we shouldn't use its full title as the article title. Sandstein 12:28, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.