Jump to content

Talk:The Alliance (The Office)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThe Alliance (The Office) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starThe Alliance (The Office) is part of the The Office (American season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 9, 2012Good article nomineeListed
July 26, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Dunder Mifflin

[edit]

I am going through several articles and changing instances of "Dunder-Mifflin" to "Dunder Mifflin" (no hyphen) as it is the proper "spelling" of the company name (see Talk page at Dunder Mifflin). Just leaving a note to say that I've gone through this page. :) Fieryrogue 23:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:TheOffice(US)1-04.jpg

[edit]

Image:TheOffice(US)1-04.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Alliance (The Office)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 17:08, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will review soon. Ruby 2010/2013 17:08, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Images, dabs, and external links look good
  • Is that the correct production code?
  • "The party planning scene, which Jenna Fischer named her favorite scene and called "longest most horrible meeting of all time," was almost entirely ad-libbed.[1][6]" - Could use some tweaking (a word or two are missing, I think)
  • Which scenes did Wilmore call his favorite? It's not very clear
  • As with "Basketball", this article could really use some more reviews. I recommend searching for others

I believe that's it. Will place the article on hold for seven days. Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 21:43, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I found another review and I tried to make the wording clearer on all the prose issues. And yeah, that's the production code. Kind of a stupid number.--Gen. Quon (talk) 23:20, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article looks good. Happy to pass for GA! Ruby 2010/2013 01:58, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Goof

[edit]

I noticed a goof in this episode. While coming up for Meredith's birthday card, Michael asks Dwight for suggestions. Dwight notes she had her uterus surgically removed and to make a joke in her card. In Sexual Harrassment (season 2, episode 2) Dwight has literally no idea about where the parts of a female private parts are. I wonder if this should be included somewhere at all. Just a suggestion.。 🎀 𝒫𝓊𝓇𝓅𝓁𝑒𝓁𝒶𝓋𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓇𝓂𝒾𝒹𝓃𝒾𝑔𝒽𝓉𝓈 𝟣𝟩 🎀 。 (talk) 21:03, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While an interesting catch, we would need reliable third-party sourcing that discusses the issue before we should feature it in the article.--Gen. Quon[Talk] 15:10, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
what's a reliable third party sourcing?
。 🎀 𝒫𝓊𝓇𝓅𝓁𝑒𝓁𝒶𝓋𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓇𝓂𝒾𝒹𝓃𝒾𝑔𝒽𝓉𝓈 𝟣𝟩 🎀 。 (talk) 00:05, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also do you think I should include this topic in the Sexual Harrassment (The Office) talk page as well? 。 🎀 𝒫𝓊𝓇𝓅𝓁𝑒𝓁𝒶𝓋𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓇𝓂𝒾𝒹𝓃𝒾𝑔𝒽𝓉𝓈 𝟣𝟩 🎀 。 (talk) 00:34, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]