Talk:That Bass Tour/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 08:46, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Calvin999 and I am reviewing this article.

Review

is the first headlining → was the first headlining
of her major label → reads like a bias and fan-written perspective
and tour dates for Oceania, Europe, and Asia were also announced later. → with Oceanic, European and Asian dates announced afterwards.
to support her major-label → Same as above
and tickets went up for sale → and tickets were released
were its → as its (HP is the only one you've mentioned, so it shouldn't read plural)
includes fourteen → included fourteen (The tour has ended, so past tense should be being used throughout when talking about things like this)
Portland Tribune‍ 's Nicole DeCosta described Trainor's dance moves during the show as being "G-rated", and said that she felt that Trainor looked laid back.[7] Ashley Lee from The Hollywood Reporter said that the show's venue was "intima[te]", and that Trainor took advantage of this.[8] → This doesn't belong in this section, these are reviews.
Critical reception section seems really short? Surely there are more reviews than this?
For such a recent tour starring such a successful and written about singer I'm surprised at the short length of this article to be honest.
What do you mean by "Dance to" in the Set list section?
Publisher parameters not needed for the references anymore

Summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Outcome

On hold for 7 days. Please try and search for more reviews or articles about this tour. I'm sure there is more than this. — Calvin999 19:16, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I fixed everything, let me know if I missed anything. I've tried adding more sources, but unfortunately the tour didn't receive that much noteworthy coverage. --Markhoris (talk) 20:19, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so surprised. Thought it would have garnered a lot. — Calvin999 20:33, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pass or Fail:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.